Powered By Blogger

Saturday, August 30, 2014

Sola Scriptura


The total sufficiency of Scripture is declared by the Apostle Paul,

“All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.”
—2 Timothy 3:16-17

For final truth and authority, all that we need is the Scripture.

What about the claim that sola Scriptura is not possible?

In an attempt to justify traditions as being of equal or higher authority than Scripture, an appeal is often made to the very last verse in John’s gospel,

“And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen.”
—John 21:25

Of course, there were many deeds and sayings of the Lord not recorded in Scripture. Nonetheless, Scripture is the authoritative record that Holy God has given His people. We do not have a single sentence that is authoritatively from the Lord, outside of what is in the written word. To appeal to a tradition for authority, when Holy God did not give it, is futile. The idea that somehow sayings and events from the Lord have been recorded in tradition is simply not true.

Another attempt to justify tradition, is the statement that the early church did not have the New Testament. The Apostle Peter speaks about the writings of the Apostle Paul when he states,

“…even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.”
—2 Peter 3:15-16

Peter also declares that he was writing so that the believers could remember what he said. So he wrote, “Wherefore I will not be negligent to put you always in remembrance of these things, though ye know them, and be established in the present truth” (2 Peter 1:12).

From the earliest days of Christianity, a substantial part of the New Testament was available. Under the inspiration of the Lord, the Apostle Paul commands his letters to be read in other churches besides those to which they were sent. This clearly shows that the written word of God was being circulated even as the Apostles lived. The Lord’s command to believe what is written has always been something that the believers could obey and did obey. In this matter we must have the humility commanded in the Scripture not to think above what is written. “…that ye might learn in us not to think of men above that which is written, that no one of you be puffed up for one against another” (1 Corinthians 4:6).

Thursday, August 28, 2014

"What is liberal Christian theology?"


Question: "What is liberal Christian theology?"

Answer: In liberal Christian teaching, which is not Christian at all, man’s reason is stressed and is treated as the final authority. Liberal theologians seek to reconcile Christianity with secular science and modern thinking. In doing so, they treat science as all-knowing and the Bible as fable-laden and false. Genesis’ early chapters are reduced to poetry or fantasy, having a message, but not to be taken literally (in spite of Jesus’ having spoken of those early chapters in literal terms). Mankind is not seen as totally depraved, and thus liberal theologians have an optimistic view of the future of mankind. The social gospel is also emphasized, while the inability of fallen man to fulfill it is denied. Whether a person is saved from his sin and its penalty in hell is no longer the issue; the main thing is how man treats his fellow man. “Love” of our fellow man becomes the defining issue. As a result of this “reasoning” by liberal theologians, the following doctrines are taught by liberal quasi-Christian theologians:

1) The Bible is not “God-breathed” and has errors. Because of this belief, man (the liberal theologians) must determine which teachings are correct and which are not. Belief that the Bible is “inspired” (in that word’s original meaning) by God is only held by simpletons. This directly contradicts 2 Timothy 3:16-17: “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.”

2) The virgin birth of Christ is a mythological false teaching. This directly contradicts Isaiah 7:14 and Luke 2.

3) Jesus did not rise again from the grave in bodily form. This contradicts the resurrection accounts in all four Gospels and the entire New Testament.

4) Jesus was a good moral teacher, but His followers and their followers have taken liberties with the history of His life (there were no “supernatural” miracles), with the Gospels having been written many years later and merely ascribed to the early disciples in order to give greater weight to their teachings. This contradicts the 2 Timothy passage and the doctrine of the supernatural preservation of the Scriptures by God.

5) Hell is not real. Man is not lost in sin and is not doomed to some future judgment without a relationship with Christ through faith. Man can help himself; no sacrificial death by Christ is necessary since a loving God would not send people to such a place as hell and since man is not born in sin. This contradicts Jesus Himself, who declared Himself to be the Way to God, through His atoning death (John 14:6).

6) Most of the human authors of the Bible are not who they are traditionally believed to be. For instance, they believe that Moses did not write the first five books of the Bible. The book of Daniel had two authors because there is no way that the detailed “prophecies” of the later chapters could have been known ahead of time; they must have been written after the fact. The same thinking is carried over to the New Testament books. These ideas contradict not only the Scriptures but historical documents which verify the existence of all the people whom the liberals deny.

7) The most important thing for man to do is to “love” his neighbor. What is the loving thing to do in any situation is not what the Bible says is good but what the liberal theologians decide is good. This denies the doctrine of total depravity, which states that man is capable to doing nothing good and loving (Jeremiah 17:9) until He has been redeemed by Christ and given a new nature (2 Corinthians 5:17).

There are many pronouncements of Scripture against those who would deny the deity of Christ (2 Peter 2:1)—which liberal Christianity does. Scripture also denounces those who would preach a different gospel from what was preached by the apostles (Galatians 1:8)—which is what the liberal theologians do in denying the necessity of Christ’s atoning death and preaching a social gospel in its place. The Bible condemns those who call good evil and evil good (Isaiah 5:20)—which some liberal churches do by embracing homosexuality as an alternative lifestyle while the Bible repeatedly condemns its practice.

Scripture speaks against those who would cry “peace, peace” when there is no peace (Jeremiah 6:14)—which liberal theologians do by saying that man can attain peace with God apart from Christ’s sacrifice on the cross and that man need not worry about a future judgment before God. The Word of God speaks of a time when men will have a form of godliness, but deny the power thereof (2 Timothy 3:5)—which is what liberal theology does in that is says that there is some inner goodness in man that does not require a rebirth by the Holy Spirit through faith in Christ. And it speaks against those who would serve idols instead of the one true God (1 Chronicles 16:26)—which liberal Christianity does in that it creates a false god according to its own liking rather than worshiping God as He is described in the whole of the Bible.


Read more: http://www.gotquestions.org/liberal-Christian-theology.html#ixzz3Bg1IdVHv

Tuesday, August 26, 2014

"What does the Bible say about legalism? How can a Christian avoid falling into the trap of legalism?"


Question: "What does the Bible say about legalism? How can a Christian avoid falling into the trap of legalism?"

Answer: The word “legalism” does not occur in the Bible. It is a term Christians use to describe a doctrinal position emphasizing a system of rules and regulations for achieving both salvation and spiritual growth. Legalists believe in and demand a strict literal adherence to rules and regulations. Doctrinally, it is a position essentially opposed to grace. Those who hold a legalistic position often fail to see the real purpose for law, especially the purpose of the Old Testament law of Moses, which is to be our “schoolmaster” or “tutor” to bring us to Christ (Galatians 3:24).

Even true believers can be legalistic. We are instructed, rather, to be gracious to one another: “Accept him whose faith is weak, without passing judgment on disputable matters” (Romans 14:1). Sadly, there are those who feel so strongly about non-essential doctrines that they will run others out of their fellowship, not even allowing the expression of another viewpoint. That, too, is legalism. Many legalistic believers today make the error of demanding unqualified adherence to their own biblical interpretations and even to their own traditions. For example, there are those who feel that to be spiritual one must simply avoid tobacco, alcoholic beverages, dancing, movies, etc. The truth is that avoiding these things is no guarantee of spirituality.

The apostle Paul warns us of legalism in Colossians 2:20-23: “Since you died with Christ to the basic principles of this world, why, as though you still belonged to it, do you submit to its rules: ‘Do not handle! Do not taste! Do not touch!’? These are all destined to perish with use, because they are based on human commands and teachings. Such regulations INDEEDhave an appearance of wisdom, with their self-imposed worship, their false humility and their harsh treatment of the body, but they lack any value in restraining sensual indulgence.” Legalists may appear to be righteous and spiritual, but legalism ultimately fails to accomplish God’s purposes because it is an outward performance instead of an inward change.

To avoid falling into the trap of legalism, we can start by holding fast to the words of the apostle John, “For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ” (John 1:17) and remembering to be gracious, especially to our brothers and sisters in Christ. “Who are you to judge someone else's servant? To his own master he stands or falls. And he will stand, for the Lord is able to make him stand” (Romans 14:4). “You, then, why do you judge your brother? Or why do you look down on your brother? For we will all stand before God's judgment seat” (Romans 14:10).

A word of caution is necessary here. While we need to be gracious to one another and tolerant of disagreement over disputable matters, we cannot accept heresy. We are exhorted to contend for the faith that was once for all entrusted to the saints (Jude 3). If we remember these guidelines and apply them in love and mercy, we will be safe from both legalism and heresy. “Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world” (1 John 4:1).


Sunday, August 24, 2014

Driscoll to Step Down From Megachurch Over Allegations of Spiritual Abuse

Driscoll to Step Down From Megachurch Over Allegations of Spiritual Abuse

August 24, 2014
Driscoll(RNS) — Controversial Seattle megachurch founder Mark Driscoll will step down for at least six weeks while leaders review formal charges lodged by a group of pastors that he abused his power.

The 43-year-old pastor has been under fire in recent months for plagiarism, inappropriate use of church funds and improper BEHAVIORtoward subordinates.

Returning from vacation Sunday (Aug. 24), Driscoll addressed Mars Hill worship services through a pre-recorded message.

“I want to say to my Mars Hill family, past and present, I’m very sorry. I genuinely mean it,” Driscoll said in his address. “I’m very sorry for the times I’ve been angry, short or insensitive. I’m very sorry for anything I’ve done to distract from our mission by inviting criticism, controversy or negative media attention.”

Driscoll said he will not do any outside speaking for the foreseeable future and postpone the publication of his next book.

“I have begun meeting with a professional team of mature Christians who provide wise counsel to help further my personal development and maturity before God and men,” Driscoll told the congregation.

Mark DeMoss, an Atlanta public relations consultant and former supporter and adviser to Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign, has been brought in to help paint Driscoll in a positive light.

Connect with Christian News
DeMoss, who represented the late Jerry Falwell Sr. and now Franklin Graham, stated that it is because of faults like Driscoll’s that he remains in BUSINESS.

“I think he’s a gifted, biblical communicator who has done effective church work in an unchurched part of the country,” DeMoss said. “I like him, I believe in him, and if I only worked with ministry leaders who were faultless, I would be out of business tonight.”

Warren Throckmorton, a Grove City COLLEGE PSYCHOLOGY professor who has been blogging details of the events surrounding the church’s turmoil, first posted an audio clip of Driscoll’s 13-minute message. Throckmorton said he is aware of other elders planning to resign or considering it.

“Storm clouds seem to be swirling around me more than ever in recent month, and I have given much thought and sought much counsel as to why that is and what to do about it,” Driscoll said. “Some have challenged various aspects of my personality and leadership style, and while some of these challenges seem unfair, I have no problem admitting I am deserving of some of these criticisms based my own past actions that I am genuinely sorry for.”

Though he has long been controversial but popular for his unapologetic chauvinism, Driscoll faced increasing turmoil this past year within evangelical circles. A front-page story in The New York Times Saturday (Aug. 23), suggested that Driscoll’s empire was “imploding.”

“He was really important — in the Internet age, Mark Driscoll definitely built up the evangelical movement enormously,” Timothy Keller, the senior pastor of Redeemer Presbyterian Church in New York, told the Times. “But the brashness and the arrogance and the rudeness in personal relationships — which he himself has confessed repeatedly — was obvious to many from the earliest days, and he has definitely now disillusioned quite a lot of PEOPLE.”

Mars Hill Church has claimed as many as 14,000 members at 15 locations across five states each Sunday.

Earlier this week, 21 former Mars Hill pastors filed charges against Driscoll, saying that he has engaged in a pattern of abusive and intimidating conduct and has not changed.

“God is not honored by conflict, strife, disunity, arguing, slander, gossip, or anything else that is inconsistent with the fruit of the spirit, and I am deeply sorry, genuinely sorry, for the times I have not lived peaceably with all men,” Driscoll said.

Mars Hill also canceled its fall Resurgence Conference, which was to feature recently resigned board members Paul Tripp and James MacDonald as speakers. Driscoll was removed as closing speaker at an October church conference in Dallas and stricken from the speaker list at a series of four Christian “Act Like Men” conferences.

DeMoss, who also helped MacDonald during a theological controversy a few years ago, declined to comment on the criticism Driscoll has faced from other fellow evangelical pastors.

Earlier this month, Driscoll was removed from Acts 29, a church-planting network of more than 500 churches he helped found, after board members said they found a pattern of “ungodly and disqualifying BEHAVIOR.”

“Based on the totality of the circumstances, we are now asking you to please step down from ministry for an extended time and seek help,” board members told Driscoll.

Driscoll recently admitted to and apologized for comments he made under the pseudonym “William Wallace II” where he posted statements critical of feminism, homosexuality and “sensitive emasculated” men. He noted those comments again in his address on Sunday.

“I have acknowledged and confessed many of my sins and shortcomings and missteps and God has been more than faithful with his forgiveness,” he said.

He has been provocative, occasionally profane, and has faced more recent allegations of plagiarism and inflating his book sales. “Mistakes were made that I am grieved by and apologize for,” he said late last year of plagiarism charges. He also apologized in March, saying “my angry-young-prophet days are over.”

After Acts 29 removed Driscoll from its membership, LifeWay Christian Resources, the nation’s second largest Christian book retailer, pulled Driscoll’s books from its website and 186 stores.

Driscoll, who came into evangelical prominence as multi-site churches and podcasts were becoming more popular, noted one of the paradoxes of being a pastor in a media age.

“The same media channels that can be used to carry a sermon to virtually anyone around the world, can be used by anyone around the globe to criticize, attack or slander,” Driscoll said. “However, another part of it is simply my fault and I will own it, confess it and move on from it as God continues to redeem me.”

Israel The Nation of Destiny

Israel The Nation of Destiny
In the present chart appears the entire text of Isaiah 62:1 - 63:6 with an additional verse from Hosea. This passage from Isaiah constitutes one sermon, presenting four major theses.

Israel The Nation of DestinyThe prophet in this chapter, as shown in the title of the study, presents the nation of Israel as the PEOPLE of destiny. This truth was shown in the study, “Israel the Hub of the Nations.” As we have already seen, Israel was created by a supernatural, biological miracle for a definite purpose — to become the channel of world-blessing. The Lord God declares the end from the beginning and from ancient times things that are not yet done (Isaiah 46:10). He never therefore has to change His plans. In Genesis 12:1-3 and those passages related thereto, the Almighty has declared His purpose of blessing all mankind through Abraham and his literal descendants, the Jews. In this study we wish to see what He has to say about God's plan for Israel.

God's Plan for Jerusalem and Israel
In verse 1 of this chapter God declares that He will not hold His peace nor take any rest until Jerusalem's righteousness goes forth as brightness and her salvation as a lamp that burneth. What is meant by Zion and Jerusalem? Zion is one of the poetical names for Jerusalem. It is located in Judea and is sometimes called the city of David. It is called the city of God in certain psalms. Many have been the changes that have come to that city, but great things are foretold for it. It will yet be the capital of the whole earth, and nations will flow to it constantly, making pilgrimages thereto in order to be taught of the God of Jacob, who will be there in the person of the Lord Jesus Christ. That the prophet is speaking of the literal city of Jerusalem cannot be doubted when one reads the first five verses of this chapter — especially, when one studies them in the light of many predictions that Jerusalem has a wonderful future before her. For example, see Psalm 48:1f; Jeremiah 3:14-18; Zephaniah 3:14-17.

It is also evident from verses 1 and 2 of our chapter that Isaiah included in his message the Jewish PEOPLE, who are in various places of the Scripture called “the daughter of Zion.” That he had the people in mind also is evident from the fact that he speaks of the going forth of Zion's righteousness and salvation as a lamp that burneth. Righteousness and salvation can be spoken only of people and not of a literal city; but, as stated above, the city of Jerusalem is undoubtedly included in this passage. In view of these facts we are confident that both the literal city and the people of Israel are seen in this prophecy.

Why is God so very much interested in Jerusalem and the Jewish people? How deep does His interest in this city and this people lie? In answer, let me call attention to His statement that He will not hold His peace, neither will He take any rest until her righteousness goes forth as brightness and her salvation as a lamp that burns. Speaking in popular language, we see that He will not cease to talk about Jerusalem, and that He will not take any rest or find satisfaction until this city and its people are blessed as contemplated in this passage. When a person has definite, specific plans in which his entire heart and soul are wrapped, he cannot have any rest or satisfaction until his purposes materialize but will constantly work toward his objective. In this verse God is speaking of Himself in terms of man's experiences. Thus He says that He will not cease talking about Jerusalem and the Jewish people, until they are clothed with His righteousness and enjoy His complete salvation.

God's righteousness is imputed to those who believe in and put their trust in the all-sufficient sacrifice of the Lord Jesus Christ, which was made nineteen hundred years ago at Calvary. No one can enjoy the righteousness of God until he in genuine repentance and in trust accepts the Lord Jesus Christ as his Saviour. Israel will have to do this before she can be clothed in His righteousness. She as a nation can never accept Jesus of Nazareth as her long-rejected Messiah and Saviour until she is given the truth concerning Him, His divine nature, and His mission. That she will be clothed in His righteousness, as stated in this prediction, is proof that the truth of the gospel will be given to her and that she upon receiving it will accept Christ, who will clothe her in His righteousness. We who have the facts of the gospel must, therefore, give her this message so that she may see her terrible mistake, turn from it, and accept Him, in whom she can have life and righteousness.

Why is God so very much interested in Israel and her salvation? The answer is that she is the nation of destiny. All spiritual blessings which have come to the world have flowed through her as the channel. The blessings of the world in the future will likewise come to it through her. Her important position might be illustrated by the game of tenpins. All who are familiar with this game know that the pins are placed in a “V” shape. The one at the vertex of the triangle is known as the kingpin. It is so placed and related to the rest that, if it is hit squarely, in falling it will strike those on either side and back of it. They in turn will strike others, and thus, with one stroke, all ten of the pins may be knocked down. That is the object of each player. Israel was placed in that position in relation to the nations. That is a truth which was brought out in the study, “Israel the Hub of the Nations.” The Almighty, in His wisdom, saw fit thus to place her. His ways and His doings are MARVELOUS in our eyes and are right and just. All who are wishing to please the Lord will be satisfied with whatever arrangement He chooses to make. Since He has placed Israel in this position, let us rejoice in that fact and act accordingly. If the Lord had seen fit to make America the kingpin, we would not complain but would rejoice in that fact. But He did not choose to place us in such a position. What I say of the American nation is true of any other.

When Israel is given the gospel, she in turn will pass it on to all other nations and will lead all peoples to an acceptance of the Lord Jesus Christ. See, for instance, Zechariah 8:22,23. Because the Lord will yet use Israel as a channel of world blessing, I speak of her in this connection as the kingpin of the nations.

It is absolutely certain that Israel as a people will be converted, for in verse 2 we see them clothed in His righteousness. The nations and their kings shall also see and recognize this fact. At that time Jerusalem is to be given another name. From Jeremiah 33:16 we learn that she will be called “Jehovah our righteousness.” Whether this is the name to which Isaiah in this passage refers, one cannot say.

At that time Israel will be the source of joy and delight to the Lord. According to verse 3 converted Israel will be a crown of beauty and a royal diadem in the Almighty's hand. Of course, these are figurative expressions referring to the royal position which she, as the head of the nations, will occupy (compare Zechariah 9:16).

Great will be the contrast between the condition of the land of Israel and its people now and what they will be then. They are termed definitely as forsaken at present. At that time they will be called “Hephzi-bah” and “Beulah.” There will be a great transformation that will come over the country. The curse will be lifted. The land will be restored to Edenic conditions. Jerusalem will be an elevated place — the joy of the whole earth. The Hebrew people will be converted, and they will have an intense love for their mother city. This national, patriotic feeling is compared to the love that a groom has for his bride. Thus Palestine, which is the center of the earth (Ezekiel 38:12), Jerusalem, which is to be the joy of the whole earth, and Israel, who is to become “the head of the nations” (Deuteronomy 28:13), will become the channel of blessing to the entire world and its teeming millions in their lives, worship, and service during the great Golden Age when the glory of God Shall encircle the earth as the waters cover the sea. “Glorious things are spoken of thee, 0 City of God” (Psalm 87:3).

Prayer for Israel Urged
Prayer figures very largely in the great economy of God. We may not be able to understand the philosophy of intercession and thanksgiving, (but from the Scriptures we learn that “the supplication of a righteous man availeth much in its working (James 5:16). For reasons known to God alone He has bound up the unfolding of His plan with the prayer-life of His people. Though we do not understand this now, we shall fully appreciate the ministry of intercession when we shall know as we are fully known.

In speaking to Jerusalem, the prophet as God's representative declared, “I have set watchmen upon thy walls, 0 Jerusalem; they shall never hold their peace day nor night.” Who are these watchmen? We understand that a watchman is a sentry who gives the alarm at the approach of an enemy. In these times of war every one understands what a sentry is and what are his duties. The Lord declares that He has watchmen upon the walls of Zion and that they never hold their peace. The word here rendered watchmen may signify either man or angel. The latter is called a watcher in the Book of Daniel. Since these watchmen mentioned by the prophet continually cry out to God and since there are no watchmen, human beings, on the walls of Zion crying out to Him, one is inclined strongly to the position that these watchmen are angels whom God has stationed there, and who are vitally interested in the Almighty's plans concerning Jerusalem and her people. By inference we are to understand that these angelic hosts are constantly bringing before the Almighty His plans with reference to this city and His people. This seems to be the implication which is to be drawn from the connection which exists between the words quoted above and the following: “Ye that are Jehovah's remembrancers, take ye no rest, and give Him no rest, till He establish, and till He make Jerusalem a praise in the earth.” The flow of thought demands this course of reasoning. These angelic watchmen are constantly reminding God of His plan concerning His nation and His city. They will never stop their ministry of intercession until He, the Almighty, makes Jerusalem a praise in the earth. Since they are so very vitally interested in this glorious consummation, the prophet urges those whom he termed “Jehovah's remembrancers” to engage in the ministry of intercession, day and night, until the Lord is justified in establishing Jerusalem a praise in the earth.

What is meant by “Jehovah's remembrancers”? Another rendering of the original which is just as accurate and possibly a little more vivid is “You who remind Jehovah.” In the light of the entire context, we must conclude that these who remind God are the praying people who know His plans and purposes for Israel in her relation to the world, and who in faith day after day remind Him of His announced plan of making her the channel of world-blessing.

Those who engage in the prayer ministry are urged to take no rest and to give God no rest until He makes Jerusalem and her people a joy to all nations. Everyone who knows God, who believes in prayer, and who delights in the ministry of intercession should constantly keep before the Lord His announced plan. As stated in the beginning of this study, we may not understand the philosophy of intercession; but the Lord has invited us to cooperate with Him in the unfolding of His plan by reminding Him of His purpose. Of course, He has not forgotten, but He wants us to remind Him of it and never stop calling His attention to it until He brings His purposes into full realization.

Whenever people see the plan of God as laid down in this and many other passages referring to Jerusalem and her sons, they will pray for them and will do all in their power to get the truth to them so that they can turn to God and allow Him to bring these promises to fullest fruition.

When God does make Jerusalem the joy of the whole earth, the era of peace will dawn. Then Israel's suffering will be over. In fact, the suffering and the sorrows of all earth's inhabitants will be a thing of the past. 0 Lord, hasten that day! In the meantime help us to cooperate with Thee in the ministry of intercession and in any other service which helps forward Thy plans among men.

Evangelization of Israel Commanded
In verses 10-12 the command is given to evangelize Israel. The prophet began his exhortation in a stately manner — the way in which one of authority at an oriental court issued commands to subordinates, instructing them to prepare a highway in order that a royal visitor might come in regal splendor to visit his sovereign. We know from ancient history that, when one king made the announcement to another concerning a proposed visit, the host king had a highway prepared for his guest in anticipation of this special occasion. Our prophet in chapter 40:3-5 chooses the same type of language, indicating the coming of a royal personage to Israel — her Messiah.

Isaiah, thinking of the coming of Israel's King, spoke of a certain preparation that must be made in anticipation of His arrival. He therefore used language that was familiar to the people and that would imply the regal splendor and royal power of her coming Monarch. He, therefore, said: “Go through, go through the gates; prepare ye the way of the people; cast up, cast up the highway; gather out the stones; lift up an ensign for the peoples.” Everyone who is familiar with Palestine and the Near East knows that in ancient times there were only donkey and camel paths, with the exception of certain international highways. For a special visitor therefore stones had to be thrown from the trails, the rough places had to be made smooth, and a highway had to be thrown up in order that the royal visitor in his chariot might come in regal splendor. What preparation must be made in anticipation of the coming of Israel's royal visitor? From the quotation just given, we cannot say; but by reading the next verse, we see what was spoken in a figure is given in plain language. “Behold, Jehovah hath proclaimed unto the end of the earth, Say ye to the daughter of Zion, Behold, thy salvation cometh; behold, his reward is with him, and his recompense before him.”

From this verse we learn that God has sent forth a proclamation to the very ends of the earth. In this He speaks to certain ones, commanding them to take a message to the people of Israel — the daughter of Zion — and to announce to them that their salvation is coming. To whom does this proclamation go? It is quite evident that, since it is sent forth to the ends of the earth, those to whom it is given are to be found in all quarters of the world. In this proclamation we read, “Say ye to the daughter of Zion.” What is the antecedent of “ye”? It can be nothing other than “Jehovah's remembrancers” of verse 6. It has been seen that these words refer to the praying people of the world. Thus those who are urged to pray that God may establish Jerusalem a praise in the earth are in verse 11 commanded to preach to Israel and to give her a certain definite message.

What is this message? It is this: “Behold, thy salvation cometh; behold, his reward is with him, and his recompense before him.” The word, salvation, in the original and in the longer form is translated “Joshua,” which means “Jehovah's deliverance or salvation.” Salvation may be worked out providentially, in one form or another. But how is it to be accomplished in this case? After making the statement that Israel's salvation is coming, the prophet declares that “his reward is with him, and his recompense before him.” From this we see that her salvation comes in the form of a person who brings deliverance to the Chosen PEOPLE and also rewards and recompenses. The word rendered salvation has been translated into the Greek and transliterated from it into the English by the name Jesus.

One can be true to the original text and render the message which the praying people are to deliver to Israel in these words: “Behold, thy Jesus cometh; behold, his reward is with him, and his recompense before him.” This appearance is evidently the second coming, for His reward is with Him and His recompense is before Him. If one wishes to get the attention of the Jew, he must expound those prophecies which foretell the glorious and victorious appearance of King Messiah. Wisdom dictates that one speak of His coming in glory and power to deliver the people of Israel and to establish a reign of righteousness upon the earth. Such a message will immediately catch the intelligent Jew's attention. In discussing those predictions which foretell this advent, one will naturally make it clear that this is His second appearance. When this is done, the way is opened for a discussion of the first coming and its meaning. The Lord knows psychology and the best approach to the Jewish people. He has told us how to gain their attention so that we can give them the full message of the gospel.

In speaking of this glorious event we are to assure the Hebrew people that, at the time of Messiah's return, after Israel has acknowledged her national sin and has accepted Him personally, she will become “The holy people, The redeemed of Jehovah: and thou shalt be called Sought out, A city not forsaken.” There is a wonderful and glorious future for her when she, evangelized and convicted of her national sin, turns in genuine faith to the Lord Jesus and pleads for His return.

But Israel must be given the truth regarding her Lord and Messiah in order that she might repudiate her national sin and confess her offense. I wish to call attention to the passage found in Hosea 5:15. An examination of all the facts of the context from which this verse is taken makes it evident that this is a messianic prediction. Hosea, speaking as if he were the Messiah, declared: “I will go and return to my place, till they [Ephraim and Judah] acknowledge their offence, and seek my face: in their affliction they will seek me earnestly.” This prediction shows that the twelve tribes of Israel committed an offense against Jehovah when He appeared in their midst. He then went back to heaven and will remain there until they acknowledge their offense against Him and seek His face. Note the language once more: “I will go and return to my place (heaven), till they acknowledge their offence, and seek my face.” This prediction means exactly what it says. The Messiah comes to Israel. The people commit an offense against Him; then He returns to heaven from which place He came. He declares that He will never leave His place and come back to the Jewish race until they have acknowledged their offense and have sought His face. Not being aware of the fact that their ancestors committed this sin nineteen hundred years ago, the Hebrew people cannot make this confession and plead for Messiah's return.

In the last clause of this prediction we are told that Israel will in her time of affliction seek Messiah earnestly. We know that the time of her affliction is the Tribulation. Thus, when the power of the holy people is broken — when Israel is brought to her extremity, she will cry out to God and plead for Messiah to come, acknowledging her national sin; then He will return and bring the deliverance (Daniel 12:7).

Messiah's Return at Israel's Request
In chapter 63:1-6 we see a dramatic presentation of Messiah's return after Israel has been evangelized, has learned of her national sin, has repented of it, and has called upon Him to return. He will then do so; He will come, taking her part, and will bring the long-desired deliverance. He will say at that time, “The day of vengeance was in my heart, and the year of my redeemed is come.” That will be the day of vengeance — a time for Messiah to take vengeance on all anti-Semites and persecutors of Israel. That will be the year for His redeemed. Messiah alone can stop all wars and establish a reign of righteousness, justice, and peace throughout the earth.

Since Messiah will never leave heaven and come back to Israel until she makes this confession, and since she does not know about the enormity of her sin, it becomes of paramount importance that we who have the truth relative to Him and His mission in the world give this message to the entire nation of Israel in order that she might make that acknowledgment and plead for His return.

Let no one think that our Lord's coming to the air to catch up the living saints and raise the dead in Christ is contingent upon our giving the truth to Israel or doing any amount of work. The rapture of the church may, so far as we know, occur at any time. Let us, while the Lord allows us to remain upon the earth, be diligent about our Father's BUSINESS, preaching the gospel, giving it first to the Jew and also to the Greek (Romans 1:16).

Friday, August 22, 2014

Israel closer than ever to a decision to fully reconquer the Gaza Strip.


Israeli Communications Minister Gilad Erdan, a member of the Security Cabinet, told Army Radio on Thursday that the resumption of Hamas rocket fire had brought Israel closer than ever to a decision to fully reconquer the Gaza Strip.

Erdan said that Hamas decided to break the tenuous ceasefire on Tuesday because Israel refused to meet a single one of the terrorists’ primary demands during talks in Cairo.

Over the past 24 hours, Hamas and allied terror groups have fired dozens of missiles into southern and central Israel, causing widespread damage and at least one injury.

Israel has thus far confined its response to targeted aerial strikes. But Erdan warned that Israeli military operations could expand dramatically if Hamas continues to attack.

“Will this happen tomorrow? It’s not certain, since the price for this will be high, but we are closer today to a ground operation than we have been at any point since the start of the operation,” said the minister.



Israel’s aerial strikes have also become somewhat less restrained. In the first weeks of the Gaza war, Israeli forces issued several warnings of the occupants of targeted buildings, even if that meant missing the targeted terrorist.

Now, these warnings seem to be coming less frequently, as Israel is more determined to actually eliminate Hamas leaders.

The terror group confirmed on Thursday that three of its senior field commanders had been killed, along with members of their families, in Israeli air strikes.

Israel also targeted the home of Hamas military leader Mohammed Deif with a volley of five powerful missiles. Palestinian sources said that Deif’s wife, child and one other unidentified person were killed. Hamas insisted that Deif had survived, but Israeli generals said all evidence pointed to his demise.

Thursday, August 21, 2014

Names of God


Names of God

The great purpose of man, especially the believer in Christ, is to glorify God. “Whether, then, you eat or drink or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God” (1 Corinthians 10:31). Essential to our ability to glorify God is the knowledge of God and knowing Him personally in view of that knowledge.

The word “glory” in the Greek New Testament is doxa which means an opinion, an estimation, or reputation in which one is held. It refers to that which should accrue to God as praise, thanksgiving, obedience, reverence, and service because of who God is and what God does (past, present, and future). In other words, giving glory to God is tied in with the knowledge of God (revelation of God), and knowing God personally (response to God).

The Lord Jesus said in John 17:3, “And this is eternal life, that they may know Thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom Thou hast sent.” The many names in Scripture constitute additional revelation of God’s character, His works, and His relationship to us based on His character and works. The names which God chose for Himself and which are ascribed to Him in the Word of God are additional revelations of the who and what of God that we may know and relate to God.

Note David’s declarations about God’s name and word in Psalm 138:1-2. God’s name declares much about His person, but it is God’s Word that reveals God and His name.

We know what God is like, not only by His perfections and works, but also by His names. They tell us many things about God’s care and concern for his own. This is one of the fascinating studies of Scripture. The various circumstances which bring forth each of the names of God are important.1

The Significance of
the Names of God in Scripture

In our twentieth century Western culture, personal names are little more than labels to distinguish one person from another. Sometimes nicknames are chosen which tell something about a person, but even this is a poor reflection of the significance of names in the Bible.

Unfortunately, to many the names God or Lord convey little more than designations of a supreme being. It says little to them about God’s character, His ways, and what God means to each of us as human beings. But in Scripture, the names of God are like miniature portraits and promises. In Scripture, a person’s name identified them and stood for something specific. This is especially true of God. Naming carried special significance. It was a sign of authority and power. This is evident in the fact that God revealed His names to His people rather than allowing them to choose their names for Him. This is also seen in the fact that God often changed the names of His people: Abram to Abraham, Sarai to Sarah, Jacob to Israel. Note also how this concept of authority and power is seen when Nebuchadnezzar changed the names of Daniel and his three friends.

The Name of God in General

There are a number of instances where no name of God is employed, but where simply the term “name” in reference to God is used as the point of focus:

(1) Abraham called on the name of the Lord (Gen. 12:8; 13:4).

(2) The Lord proclaimed His own name before Moses (Ex. 33:19; 34:5).

(3) Israel was warned against profaning the name of the Lord (Lev. 13:21; 22:2, 32).

(4) The name of the Lord was not to be taken in vain (Ex. 20:7; Deut. 5:11).

(5) The priests of Israel were to minister in the name of the Lord (Deut. 18:5; 21:5).

(6) The name of God is called “wonderful” in Judges 13:18.

(7) To call on the name of the Lord was to worship Him as God (Gen. 21:33; 26:25).

Consequently, from this we can conclude that such phrases as “the name of the LORD” or “the name of God” refer to God’s whole character. It was a summary statement embodying the entire person of God.2

When we turn to the New Testament we find the same. The name Jesus is used in a similar way to the name of God in the Old Testament:

(1) Salvation is through His name (John 1:12).

(2) Believers are to gather in His name (Matt. 18:20).

(3) Prayer is to be made in His name (John 14:13-14).

(4) The servant of the Lord who bears the name of Christ will be hated (Matt. 10:22).

(5) The book of Acts makes frequent mention of worship, service, and suffering in the name of Jesus Christ (Acts 4:18; 5:28, 41; 10:43; 19:17).

(6) It is at the name of Jesus that every knee will one day bow and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord (Phil. 2:10-11).

So, just as the name of God in the Old Testament spoke of the holy character of God the Father, so the name of Jesus in the New Testament speaks of the holy character of God the Son.3


Overview of the
Names of God in Scripture

(1) Elohim: The plural form of EL, meaning “strong one.” It is used of false gods, but when used of the true God, it is a plural of majesty and intimates the trinity. It is especially used of God’s sovereignty, creative work, mighty work for Israel and in relation to His sovereignty (Isa. 54:5; Jer. 32:27; Gen. 1:1; Isa. 45:18; Deut. 5:23; 8:15; Ps. 68:7).

Compounds of El:

El Shaddai:“God Almighty.” The derivation is uncertain. Some think it stresses God’s loving supply and comfort; others His power as the Almighty one standing on a mountain and who corrects and chastens (Gen. 17:1; 28:3; 35:11; Ex. 6:1; Ps. 91:1, 2).
El Elyon: “The Most High God.” Stresses God’s strength, sovereignty, and supremacy (Gen. 14:19; Ps. 9:2; Dan. 7:18, 22, 25).
El Olam: “The Everlasting God.” Emphasizes God’s unchangeableness and is connected with His inexhaustibleness (Gen. 16:13).
(2) Yahweh (YHWH): Comes from a verb which means “to exist, be.” This, plus its usage, shows that this name stresses God as the independent and self-existent God of revelation and redemption (Gen. 4:3; Ex. 6:3 (cf. 3:14); 3:12).

Compounds of Yahweh: Strictly speaking, these compounds are designations or titles which reveal additional facts about God’s character.

Yahweh Jireh (Yireh): “The Lord will provide.” Stresses God’s provision for His people (Gen. 22:14).
Yahweh Nissi:“The Lord is my Banner.” Stresses that God is our rallying point and our means of victory; the one who fights for His people (Ex. 17:15).
Yahweh Shalom:“The Lord is Peace.” Points to the Lord as the means of our peace and rest (Jud. 6:24).
Yahweh Sabbaoth:“The Lord of Hosts.” A military figure portraying the Lord as the commander of the armies of heaven (1 Sam. 1:3; 17:45).
Yahweh Maccaddeshcem: “The Lord your Sanctifier.” Portrays the Lord as our means of sanctification or as the one who sets believers apart for His purposes (Ex. 31:13).
Yahweh Ro’i: “The Lord my Shepherd.” Portrays the Lord as the Shepherd who cares for His people as a shepherd cares for the sheep of his pasture (Ps. 23:1).
Yahweh Tsidkenu: “The Lord our Righteousness.” Portrays the Lord as the means of our righteousness (Jer. 23:6).
Yahweh Shammah: “The Lord is there.” Portrays the Lord’s personal presence in the millennial kingdom (Ezek. 48:35).
Yahweh Elohim Israel: “The Lord, the God of Israel.” Identifies Yahweh as the God of Israel in contrast to the false gods of the nations (Jud. 5:3.; Isa. 17:6).
(3) Adonai: Like Elohim, this too is a plural of majesty. The singular form means “master, owner.” Stresses man’s relationship to God as his master, authority, and provider (Gen. 18:2; 40:1; 1 Sam. 1:15; Ex. 21:1-6; Josh. 5:14).

(4) Theos: Greek word translated “God.” Primary name for God used in the New Testament. Its use teaches: (1) He is the only true God (Matt. 23:9; Rom. 3:30); (2) He is unique (1 Tim. 1:17; John 17:3; Rev. 15:4; 16:7); (3) He is transcendent (Acts 17:24; Heb. 3:4; Rev. 10:6); (4) He is the Savior (John 3:16; 1 Tim. 1:1; 2:3; 4:10). This name is used of Christ as God in John 1:1, 18; 20:28; 1 John 5:20; Tit. 2:13; Rom. 9:5; Heb. 1:8; 2 Pet. 1:1.

(5) Kurios: Greek word translated “Lord.” Stresses authority and supremacy. While it can mean sir (John 4:11), owner (Luke 19:33), master (Col. 3:22), or even refer to idols (1 Cor. 8:5) or husbands (1 Pet. 3:6), it is used mostly as the equivalent of Yahweh of the Old Testament. It too is used of Jesus Christ meaning (1) Rabbi or Sir (Matt. 8:6); (2) God or Deity (John 20:28; Acts 2:36; Rom. 10:9; Phil. 2:11).

(6) Despotes: Greek word translated “Master.” Carries the idea of ownership while kurios stressed supreme authority (Luke 2:29; Acts 4:24; Rev. 6:10; 2 Pet. 2:1; Jude 4).

(7) Father:A distinctive New Testament revelation is that through faith in Christ, God becomes our personal Father. Father is used of God in the Old Testament only 15 times while it is used of God 245 times in the New Testament. As a name of God, it stresses God’s loving care, provision, discipline, and the way we are to address God in prayer (Matt. 7:11; Jam. 1:17; Heb. 12:5-11; John 15:16; 16:23; Eph. 2:18; 3:15; 1 Thess. 3:11).

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Daniel 9:26-27 The prince that shall come. . .


The Book of Daniel is filled with prophecies about the end-times. Teaching pastors would do well to spend a considerable amount of time reading it, understanding it and sharing it with their congregations. We are living in one of the most amazing times in all of human history and the prophet Daniel helps us to catch a glimpse of what’s yet to come.

There is not enough time or space to do an exhaustive study or the entire book of Daniel. So this will be concise and to the point. Daniel 9:26-27 reads, “Then after the sixty-two weeks the Messiah will be cut off and have nothing, and the people of the prince who is to come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. And its end will come with a flood; even to the end there will be war; desolations are determined. 27 And he will make a firm covenant with the many for one week, but in the middle of the week he will put a stop to sacrifice and grain offering; and on the wing of abominations will come one who makes desolate, even until a complete destruction, one that is decreed, is poured out on the one who makes desolate.”

There is much here to understand and I encourage you to do an in-depth study of the entire book of Daniel. But for the purpose of this article, let’s focus on “the prince who is to come” and“he will make a firm covenant with the many for one week.”

The “prince who is to come” is the Antichrist who comes on the scene at the start of the “the great tribulation” (Matt. 24:21; Mark 13:19; Rev.7:14), also known as “Daniel’s 70th week.”

This prince “will make firm” (confirm; cause to prevail) a “covenant with the many,” that is, with nation of Israel “for one week” (a seven year agreement). Daniel goes on (later in his prophecy) to tell us that three and one half years into this “covenant” the Antichrist will break his agreement with Israel and cause the “abomination of desolation” against the Jewish religion. This violation will ruin what Jews regard as sacred, namely their holy temple and the honoring of God’s presence there. Jesus refers directly to this in His Olivet Discourse (Matt. 24:15).

Some questions to ponder:
1. Isn’t it fascinating how God has already told us what’s coming?
2. Isn’t it fascinating that the nation of Israel has said repeatedly, “We just want to live in peace.”
3. Isn’t it fascinating that the “peace-brokers” are trying to find a “long-lasting” solution?

We should not try to establish times or dates. We do not know when this “prince” will come on to the scene and make his “firm covenant” with Israel. But we can observe how very much a “long-lasting” peace is desired.

Last question (for now):
4. What will be the circumstances that will cause the Jewish people, to agree to this particular covenant, with this particular individual, when they have been so wary of all the others?


“Pray for the peace of Jerusalem: “May they prosper who love you,” (Psalm 122:6).

Tuesday, August 19, 2014

Why the Resurrection Matters to You


Why the Resurrection Matters to You

Explaining evidence and meaning of the resurrection
By Bill Bright


Every day more and more people are taking a look -- for some, a 2nd one -- at the historical person of Jesus of Nazareth.

So why do His life and teachings still generate such interest today?

What I Found in My Search

To begin with, everything about Him was unique: The prophecies of His coming. His birth. His life. His teachings. His miracles. His death. And especially His resurrection.

It is history's most significant event.

The validity of Jesus' claims about Himself rests on the Resurrection -- whether He rose from the dead or stayed in the grave.

Many skeptics say that to believe in a risen Christ is nothing more than a blind leap of faith with little or no basis in truth.

When confronted with the facts, however, those who are intellectually honest have been forced to admit that the Resurrection is an historical event based on irrefutable proofs.

On my spiritual journey from agnosticism to faith in Christ, I, like many people, had a problem with the Resurrection.

But my personal study brought me to a firm conviction that a bodily resurrection is the only explanation for Christ's empty tomb.

Several evidences helped me reach this conclusion.

Evidence for the Resurrection

1st, Christ predicted His resurrection. The Bible records, "From that time Jesus began to show His disciples that He must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things ... and be killed, and be raised up on the third day" (Matthew 16:21, New American Standard Bible). Even though His followers did not understand what He was telling them at the time, they remembered His words and recorded them.
2nd, Jesus made numerous appearances to His followers. He comforted the mourners outside His tomb on Sunday morning. On the road to Emmaus, He explained things about Himself from the Old Testament. Later, He ate in their presence and invited them to touch Him. Scripture records that Jesus was seen by more than 500 at one time. Some may argue that a few people could have agreed to a deception, but how can one explain the collaboration of 500 people?
3rd, the unrelenting faith of the disciples convinces me of the Resurrection. Those disciples who were once so afraid that they deserted their Lord now courageously proclaimed this news, risking their lives to preach. Their bold and courageous behavior does not make sense unless they knew with absolute certainty that Jesus had been raised from the dead.
4th, the growth of the Christian church confirms the Resurrection. Peter's first sermon, which dealt with Christ's resurrection, stirred people to receive Him as their living Savior. Luke records the thrilling results: "That day there were added about three thousand souls" (Acts 2:41). And that group of believers has multiplied until now it reaches around the world. Today, there are hundreds of millions of believers.
Finally, the testimony of hundreds of millions of transformed lives through the centuries shows the power of the Resurrection. Many have been delivered from addictions. The destitute and despairing have found hope. Broken marriages have been restored. The most conclusive proof for the resurrection of Jesus Christ is that He is living within believers today in all of His resurrected life and transforming power.
The Resurrection sets Christianity apart. No other religious leader has broken the power of death and conquered sin.

Significance of the Resurrection

The Resurrection confirms that Jesus is who He claimed to be. Let us consider the magnitude of this event:

The Resurrection proved that Christ was divine. The fact that Jesus Christ died on the cross does not prove in itself He is God. Jesus proved His deity by fulfilling the prophecies of His death and by His return from the grave. The Bible declares that "by being raised from the dead [Christ] was proved to be the mighty Son of God, with the holy nature of God Himself" (Romans 1:4, The Living Bible).
The Resurrection proved Christ's power to forgive sin. The Bible asserts, "If Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins" (1 Corinthians 15:17). By rising from the dead, Jesus proved His authority and power to break the bonds of sin and to assure forgiveness and eternal life to all who accept His gift of salvation.
The Resurrection revealed Christ's power over death. The Bible records, "Christ rose from the dead and will never die again. Death no longer has any power over him" (Romans 6:9, TLB). The Resurrection secured our victory over death as well and "lifted us up from the grave into glory along with Christ, where we sit with him in the heavenly realms" (Ephesians 2:6).
The Resurrection defeated God's enemy. From the moment of his original rebellion until the day of the Cross, the devil fought viciously and cunningly to overthrow the kingdom of God. Satan must have thought he had dealt the final and decisive blow in this age-old war. But this was the devil's most serious miscalculation. The Cross was heaven's triumph. And when Jesus Christ arose, the power of sin and death was forever shattered. Because of the Resurrection, Christians need never fear Satan or death again.
Completion of Redemption

For 40 days after His death and resurrection, Christ appeared many times to His followers.

On 1 occasion, He gathered His remaining 11 disciples on a mountain in Galilee and gave them His Great Commission.

He said, "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always" (Matthew 28:19,20).

Later, the Book of Acts records that, on the Mount of Olives, He admonished His disciples to wait in Jerusalem until they were filled with the Holy Spirit and then to take His message to Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria and to the ends of the world (Acts 1:4,5,8).

Immediately after, He rose skyward and disappeared into the clouds, leaving the disciples staring after Him in amazed wonder.

The ascension of Christ was the final act in the drama of redemption. His mission completed, Jesus Christ was exalted to His former glory.

The resurrection of Jesus Christ ranks as history's most revolutionary event.

One cannot deny that He shook the world in His day.

But His life just as dramatically has shaped the course of history in our time.

The Resurrection is the final proof that Jesus Christ is who He claimed to be.

Monday, August 18, 2014

The Importance of Christian Education in the Church [TBCA starts today]


The Importance of Christian Education in the Church
TBCA starts today


Christianity has been of the greatest importance to the USA since the time when the first settlers stepped on the Plymouth Rock. Ever since the USA has upheld the Christian values teaching them as mandatory in schools and even conducting witch hunts. At present the church is separated from the State to assure the normal functioning of other religions, while being no longer mandatory, but rather optional for studying. In the following essay I am going to speak about the Christian education as always being the option for the citizens of the USA and to explain the importance of Christian education and the role it plays in our society.

Christianity has constantly played a great role in human education in Europe as well as in the USA. The first schools in both Europe were Catholic that taught high moral standards and compliance with the God's rules. After the Protestant reformation, the role of Catholicism was drastically reduced. When the first settlers arrived to the USA, the religion they were teaching in schools was Protestantism. Christianity educated people in schools while placing certain limits on the human development. Unlike Catholic and Orthodox churches that highly believed in God's dominance and written scrutiny and therefore rejected various sciences that are anti-religious (genetic engineering, nuclear sciences, etc.), protestant churches considered good deeds and helpful behavior to be of the ultimate importance to God. Protestant churches believed that God created any sciences possible; therefore it was a human duty to study as much as possible as well as proclaiming God and expressing God in all human achievements.

Christianity if taught at schools leaves a great stigma on the students. The statistics say that students who study Christianity and Christian values at school are much less likely to engage in illegal activities such as underage drinking, promiscuous sex, and carrying arms. In US schools from all students who engage in the illegal activities only 12% of them are students studying Christianity or are engaged in Christian schools.

On a more personal level I believe that Christian education is of great importance to the whole country. Students in their teens are only forming their future character and certainly need various people to take example from. It is no wonder that in poor schools and in what we call bad neighborhoods, the crime rates are much higher--children that grow up in violent environment are in my opinion are going to be violent. It is a common fact that boys that grew up in families where fathers beat up their wives are more likely to also beat up their future spouses like their fathers. All these examples indeed show us the importance of education in the early years of human life and make us understand that education should be of great value to the society. Christianity on the other hand discourages arms, sex before marriage, as well as drinking. When exposed to Christian morals, students are more likely to develop personal attitude that would allow them to resist the peer pressure, engage in profound studying and strong desire for excellence. This shows the important role of domestic security that the Christian education provides for the society that promulgates Christianity in schools.

At the same time, Christianity being only optional provides the necessary freedoms to students of other religions, or even atheists who do not want to be influenced by the religious thought. The freedom or choice, makes the Christian teachers compete for the students and therefore not to abuse the Christian moral as it happens in areas of the world where Christianity is dominant (e.g. in Serbia and Horvatia Christianity prompted the people to eradicate the Muslims from the Christian land).

In conclusion I would like to say that the Christian educational option in fact provides a wonderful complementary material to students in the USA. The statistics that show reduction in violence, loose behavior or engagement in illegal activities corroborate the practical importance of Christian education, while the separation of church and state assures that no single religious leader can take control of the political life in the USA. The role of being the crime reducer that the Christian education represents the true need of such education in the society.



Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/134683

Sunday, August 17, 2014

DR. D. MARTYN LLOYD-JONES ON SECONDARY SEPARATION


DR. D. MARTYN LLOYD-JONES ON SECONDARY SEPARATION


By way of introduction, Dr. Peter Masters is pastor of the Metropolitan Tabernacle in London, where Charles Spurgeon was once pastor. Spurgeon dealt with the issue of separation himself in the Downgrade Controversy.

Let me also tell you that I personally don’t fully agree with everything that Masters offers in the entirety of his May 2013 message Secondary Separation – When to Stand Apart, which is excerpted below.

That noted, we live in a time where the evil influence of mainstream evangelicalism’s embrace of the Emerging Church has served to spread a wrong understanding of tolerance deeply into the very heart of the visible church.

Along with this—as well as a rampant charismania—we’ve also been witnessing the romanticizing of Roman Catholic mystics leading to the full-on embrace of corrupt Contemplative Spirituality/Mysticism (CSM).

Right now we have a recipe for spiritual disaster because people are becoming deluded into following their own fickle hearts (cf. Jeremiah 17:9). And, as they do, they attribute to God what are actually their own thoughts.

History shows that this always leads to falling in love with the self (cf. 2 Timothy 3:2) and with it, a phony ecumenicism. If left unchecked the delusions of CSM lead its practitioners all the way to universalism.1

As such, I think the idea of what kind of separation from such as these the Christian, faithful to God’s Word, should practice is an important issue that needs to be discussed; and quickly:

In recent times the claim has been made that secondary separation is extremism. This writer has been named as going much further than Dr Martyn Lloyd-Jones (1899-1981), the famous minister of Westminster Chapel, who made a call to evangelicals to leave apostate denominations.

It is claimed that Dr Lloyd-Jones opposed secondary separation, saying, ‘If I am convinced that a man is my brother I am going to bear with him. I am not going to divide from him…We are born again by the same Spirit into the same family…I do not separate from my brother’ (Unity in Truth pp 120-121).

Dr Lloyd-Jones, however, was not speaking about secondary separation in that quotation, but about unity between evangelicals who had left apostate denominations. His dream and hope was that all British evangelicals would separate from error and join together in a new denomination.

Not all were enthusiastic, some saying to him, ‘We are Baptists, and we could not join with paedo-baptists,’ while others said, ‘We are Calvinists and could not join with Arminians.’ Dr Lloyd-Jones was appealing to these and said that he would not separate from his brother and nor should they.

He was not talking about separating from evangelicals who cooperate with non-evangelicals in their denominations, for he advocated such separation. He was appealing for unity among those who had separated. He felt they should set aside their convictions on baptism and the doctrines of grace, and so on, for the sake of unity.

Dr Lloyd-Jones and Billy Graham

To prove the point we remember the way in which Dr Lloyd-Jones refused to work with Billy Graham, and this is a significant example of secondary separation. In 1963 the evangelist asked Dr Lloyd-Jones to chair the first World Congress on Evangelism (eventually held in Berlin in 1966; predecessor to Lausanne). Dr Lloyd-Jones told Billy Graham that if he would stop having liberals and Roman Catholics on his platform and drop the invitation system he would support and chair the Congress.

Billy Graham would not change his views, and Dr Lloyd-Jones declined to endorse or commend or work with him. No doubt the meeting between them was courteously conducted (it lasted three hours) but the outcome was a firm application of secondary separation.

Dr Lloyd-Jones adopted the same attitude to Billy Graham’s London crusades. He took the view, and stated it publicly, that to have visible unity with those who are opposed to essential matters of salvation was sinful. (He also believed the invitation system was a source of mass-delusion and harm to churches.)

Despite Billy Graham’s high standing with most British evangelicals, the enthusiastic support he received from the secular media, the fact that his name was a household word, and despite the significant place in world evangelicalism that he was offering to Dr Lloyd-Jones, the latter stood by his biblical principle, and declined all the overtures. He would not commend or work with Dr Billy Graham. This is true loyalty to God’s Word, and protectiveness of one’s congregation.

For what it’s worth, as far as the present writer is aware he goes no further in his view of secondary separation than Dr Lloyd-Jones (although he does not share the great man’s latter day enthusiasm for a new evangelical denomination).

Spurgeon on Secondary Separation

In a famous sermon, C H Spurgeon expressed the very same position in these words: ‘That I might not stultify my testimony I have cut myself clear of those who err from the faith, and even from those who associate with them’ (Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit 1888, No. 2047). Dr Lloyd-Jones was of the same mind, but both exercised tender discretion.

We sometimes hear it said that there is no text in the Bible that requires secondary separation, but we find this assertion astonishing. For one thing, the many texts that command primary separation are emphatic, insistent, obligatory, and imperative, showing how great a wrong it is to reject them.

They are categorical and absolute. They are compulsory and not merely permissive. Disobedience certainly puts a believer into the category of one who ‘walks disorderly’ and not in line with the instructions of the apostles. For such the word of 2 Thessalonians 3.14 is clear: ‘And if any man obey not our word by this epistle, note that man, and have no company with him, that he may be ashamed.’

For another thing, the solemn words of Revelation 18.4 express a deep and prophetic principle – ‘Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins…’
In 2 John 11 we learn that the one who even expresses a blessing to a false teacher is a participant in his evil deeds. God assigns guilt to the non-separator, and we must not brush that aside.

In the end, those who mistakenly remain in apostate denominations contribute to (whether they aim to or not) the victory of the Lord’s enemies. We see this in the historic decline of once great evangelical denominations.

In this article we have called it a great wrong to disobey the separation texts. Dr Lloyd-Jones called it a sin. These scriptures certainly require that we stand apart from those who recognise and assist false teachers. (source)

Dr. Peter Masters

Saturday, August 16, 2014

What is biblical discernment and why is it important?


What is biblical discernment and why is it important?

By John MacArthur



Biblical DiscernmentIn its simplest definition, discernment is nothing more than the ability to decide between truth and error, right and wrong. Discernment is the process of making careful distinctions in our thinking about truth. In other words, the ability to think with discernment is synonymous with an ability to think biblically.

First Thessalonians 5:21-22 teaches that it is the responsibility of every Christian to be discerning: "But examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good; abstain from every form of evil." The apostle John issues a similar warning when he says, "Do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world" (1 John 4:1). According to the New Testament, discernment is not optional for the believer-it is required.

The key to living an uncompromising life lies in one's ability to exercise discernment in every area of his or her life. For example, failure to distinguish between truth and error leaves the Christian subject to all manner of false teaching. False teaching then leads to an unbiblical mindset, which results in unfruitful and disobedient living-a certain recipe for compromise.

Unfortunately, discernment is an area where most Christians stumble. They exhibit little ability to measure the things they are taught against the infallible standard of God's Word, and they unwittingly engage in all kinds of unbiblical decision-making and behavior. In short, they are not armed to take a decidedly biblical stand against the onslaught of unbiblical thinking and attitudes that face them throughout their day.

Discernment intersects the Christian life at every point. And God's Word provides us with the needed discernment about every issue of life. According to Peter, God "has granted to us everything pertaining to life and godliness, through the true knowledge of Him who called us by His own glory and excellence" (2 Peter 1:3). You see, it is through the "true knowledge of Him," that we have been given everything we need to live a Christian life in this fallen world. And how else do we have true knowledge of God but through the pages of His Word, the Bible? In fact, Peter goes on to say that such knowledge comes through God's granting "to us His precious and magnificent promises" (2 Peter 1:4).

Discernment -- the ability to think biblically about all areas of life -- is indispensable to an uncompromising life. It is incumbent upon the Christian to seize upon the discernment that God has provided for in His precious truth! Without it, Christians are at risk of being "tossed here and there by waves, and carried about by every wind of doctrine" (Ephesians 4:14).

Friday, August 15, 2014

Mark Driscoll books have been pulled from 180 Christian stores


Books by megachurch Pastor Mark Driscoll have been pulled from 180 Christian stores. LifeWay stores have temporarily suspended sales of his books, including "A Call to Resurgence" and "Real Marriage."

"LifeWay Stores and LifeWay.com are not selling Mark Driscoll's books while we assess the situation regarding his ministry," the company said in a statement.

lRelated Lauren Bacall on writing: The most complete experience I've ever had
JACKET COPY
Lauren Bacall on writing: The most complete experience I've ever had
SEE ALL RELATED
8
Driscoll founded Seattle's Mars Hill Church in 1996; it has grown to a reported 13,000 attendees and 15 locations. It is known for its charismatic pastor, big-screen sermons, festive atmosphere and loud music.

Recently, both pastor and church have been plagued by public criticisms. In early August, families that had left the church and are critical of Driscoll picketed a Mars Hill Church in Washington.

cComments
Got something to say? Start the conversation and be the first to comment.
ADD A COMMENT
0
Last week, the church network Acts 29 dismissed Mars Hill Church and Driscoll from its group. Driscoll was a co-founder of Acts 29, which has helped create 500 churches around the world.

The Seattle Times reports Acts 29's decision to dismiss Driscoll came "after a string of allegations that he regularly bullied or shunned churchgoers and spent church funds inappropriately." This summer, according to the Seattle Times, "Mars Hill told church members that it had confirmed that some money given to help start churches overseas had instead gone for Mars Hill expenses."

A LifeWay representative told Publishers Weekly that Acts 29's dismissal of Driscoll precipitated their removing his books from their stores.

In a public statement on its website, Acts 29 writes, "It is our conviction that the nature of the accusations against Mark, most of which have been confirmed by him, make it untenable and unhelpful to keep Mark and Mars Hill in our network."

One complaint against Driscoll is that church funds were used to boost sales of his book "Real Marriage," which reached the New York Times bestseller list in 2012. The church reportedly paid a marketing company more than $200,000 to boost the book's sales. Driscoll has admitted that the company was paid, but that he thought it was simply to expand sales, not game the bestseller list.

His 2013 book "A Call to Resurgence" was the subject of another controversy, this time about plagiarism. Some observers say he lifted passages inappropriately; others say he sufficiently cited the original sources.

Other allegations are less literary. The Seattle Times reports that Driscoll has been accused of "bullying and a practice of shunning members who raise questions or disagree." News has recently come out that in 2000, Driscoll created a false identity to post misogynistic and homophobic rants online, including one describing Christian men as "Promise Keeping homoerotic worship loving mama's boy sensitive emasculated neutered exact male replica evangellyfish." One former church member told the paper, "It is not OK for [Driscoll] to be arrogant, abusive or prideful."

Yet Driscoll still has supporters. At the Religious News Service, one writes, '"When Christians have grown so bitter toward someone that we can't even accept their apologies, something has gone seriously wrong."

Thursday, August 14, 2014

Quick Comparison of Bible Versions


Quick Comparison of Bible Versions

It is often said that all Bible versions are basically the same, that their differences are just minor wording changes. Read the following comparison between the King James Version and the best-selling modern Bible translation, the New International Version, and then decide for yourself whether or not this is true. We have added bold text to assist the reader in recognizing changes.

KING JAMES BIBLE

NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION
Why did Jesus come to earth?
Luke 9:56
For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them. And they went to another village.
Matt. 18:11
For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost.

Luke 9:56
and they went to another village.


Matt. 18:11
(missing)


Is repentance important?
Matt. 9:13
...I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance. Matt. 9:13
...I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners.

For whom did Jesus die?
I Cor. 5:7
...Christ our passover is sacrificed for us: I Cor. 5:7
...Christ, our Passover lamb, has been sacrificed.

In Whom must you believe to be saved?
John 6:47
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life. John 6:47
I tell you the truth, he who believes has everlasting life.

Was Joseph really the father of Jesus?
Luke 2:33
And Joseph and his mother marvelled at those things which were spoken of him. Luke 2:33
The child's father and mother marveled at what was said about him.

Did Jesus give His disciples power to heal?
Mark 3:15
...power to heal sickness, and to cast out devils. Mark 3:15
...authority to drive out demons.

If it's hard to do, should we just remove it?
Mark 11:26
But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses. Mark 11:26
(missing)

Who is in charge?
I Cor. 10:28
...for the earth is the Lord's and the fulness thereof: I Cor. 10:28
(last part of verse missing)

How must we deal with our enemies?
Matt. 5:44
...Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you. Matt. 5:44
...Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.

Where did Jesus go?
John 16:16
A little while, and ye shall not see me: and again a little while, and ye shall see me, because I go to the Father. John 16:16
In a little while you will see me no more, and then after a little while you will see me.


Question: Aren't some of these things included in the NIV in the footnotes?
Answer: That is not the same as including them in the text. When a young Christian sees these passages have been moved to the footnotes, he or she will assume that they are probably not really part of God's Word. After all, the translators did not include them in the text, but simply implied that "some" manuscripts include them. What they are not told is that the vast majority of texts used by the early church included these words. They are God's Words!

Wednesday, August 13, 2014

Looking for Idols in Ezekiel 14



Looking for Idols in Ezekiel 14

Posted on August 11, 2014 by Jay Adams
idolSon of man, these men have taken their idols into their hearts, and set the stumbling block of their iniquity before their faces. (Ezekiel 14:3, ESV)

Ezekiel 14 has (wrongly) been used to support the “idols of the heart” doctrine.

However, the passage says nothing about looking for idols in counseling or for any other purpose. What, then, was going on?

Here was a people just about to be exiled for idolatry (physical idolatry—worshiping man-made objects of wood and metal). Ezekiel speaks throughout his book of such, and condemns the people for it.

Here, he describes how bad the problem had become: these same people, going out to Babylon, were about to carry images of the idols they were supposed to leave behind in their hearts!

They were “setting up” these idols upon their hearts so that, even when not physically present, they would be able to put them “before their faces.” What a tragedy! What an attachment to the idolatry they had become so accustomed to!

That’s what the passage is referring to. The idols (now in imagery) would accompany them was they went off in exile. There is nothing about their hearts manufacturing idols; nothing about seeking such imaginary idols in order to deal with counseling problems (biblical counseling was the farthest thing from Ezekiel’s mind).

It is important not to confuse things that differ. Never are these idols (now, literally, ON their hearts) said to be the products of their hearts. Rather, they have been placed on them (in their minds[1]) in order to carry them (in mind) with them.

[1] The Hebrews had no word for mind—when thinking of it, they used the word “heart.””

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

Megachurch minister remains under fire


CHARLOTTE, N.C. – A North Carolina megachurch minister remains under fire for his alleged practice of instructing volunteers to strategically respond to salvation calls in order to bolster baptism numbers.

Steven Furtick leads Elevation Church in Charlotte, North Carolina, one of the largest megachurches in the United States, with weekly attendance above 14,000. According to reports, Furtick performed 3,519 baptisms in the first eight months of 2013 alone, and baptized 400 attendees during a ceremony just last month.

In addition to those taking note of the large number of baptisms, Furtick recently drew controversy when Elevation Church published a document entitled Spontaneous Baptisms How To Guide. The nine-page document outlines the baptism policy followed during one of its previous outreach events.

The baptism how-to guide features detailed instructions for volunteers, including directions on how strategically-placed members are to sit in the auditorium and “be the first ones to move” toward the baptism area “when pastor gives the call.”


“Sit in the auditorium and begin moving forward when Pastor Steven says go,” the church document instructs. “Move intentionally through the highest visibility areas and the longest walk.”

Speed and efficiency are important to the baptism process, according to the Elevation Church guide.

“The first people going into the changing rooms have got to be people who move quickly, they must be changed and out on stage in a few minutes,” the document states. “Pick young energetic people, not necessarily those who are there first. Think of the room in terms of a NASCAR pit stop, it has to be a quick in and quick out.”

Connect with Christian News
According to the baptism guide, volunteers should also be placed in hallways to “create critical mass as people are moving through the hallway toward [the baptism area].”

As allegations of stimulating baptisms have drawn criticism from other Christians, many continue to question the practices of Furtick and Elevation Church. James Duncan, a blogger and professor at Anderson University, accused Furtick of seeding the auditorium with “shills who pretend to be responding to the call.”

“[The volunteers’] high-visibility movement is designed to manipulate others to follow,” Duncan contended in a blog post. “If Furtick was confident in his message and in the efficacy of the Holy Spirit’s call, he shouldn’t need fake converts.”

“For good doctrinal reasons that even Steven Furtick understands, [the church volunteers] never ought to have responded in the first place,” Duncan argued. “Not only are they lying, they are pretending to sinfully partake in the most important sacrament of their church. That’s serious stuff for a pastor and church to be encouraging.”

But in a recent sermon, Furtick publicly addressed the baptism controversy, denying that the baptisms are manufactured. According to the Christian Post, Furtick declared that he is “too scared of God to do something like that.”

“If you want to pick on my house, okay,” Furtick stated. “But it’s a different territory when you start picking on people who made a decision to be baptized for Jesus Christ.”

“To take the fact that we have volunteers that lead the way so people will know where to go and to act as if they were pretending to be baptized and to negate the sincere faith decision of precious people who had one of the most meaningful experiences of their life, that’s just sick!” he stated.

The same day, Furtick performed a reported 400 baptisms in the auditorium.

Reports of Elevation Church’s questionable baptism policy came soon after Warren Cole Smith of WORLD Magazine revealed that Furtick lives in a recently-constructed, $1.7 million mansion.

“People were willing to excuse [Furtick’s] flamboyance and extravagant lifestyle by saying, ‘But, he’s doing such great work,’” Smith told The Huffington Post. “Now, this [baptism] controversy calls into serious question the legitimacy of conversion rates the church has been claiming.”

“This is one of the byproducts of an evangelical movement that favors emotionalism and personal experience over doctrine, theology and biblical teaching,” Smith stated.

Monday, August 11, 2014

Mars Hill Responds to Acts 29


The Board of Advisors & Accountability of Mars Hill Church has responded to the Acts 29 church-planting network's "divisive" decision to dismiss Pastor Mark Driscoll and his megachurch from membership, complaining it was announced prior to speaking directly with the pastor or any of the board members.

"No one from Acts 29 contacted Larry Osborne of our board prior to this decision," reads a letter signed by Mars Hill BoAA chairman Michael Van Skaik and member Larry Osborne and sent to church members in response to the Acts 29 Network's announcement. "And perhaps most significantly, Pastor Mark was not personally contacted by the A29 board prior to receiving this announcement."

Despite apologies from Pastor Driscoll, the Acts 29 Network he founded more than a decade ago announced Friday they have dismissed him and his Seattle, Washington-based church from membership, citing complaints from other network pastors concerning the minister's divisive behavior. The pastor was also asked to remove himself from ministry.

"Be assured of this, the formal charges that were filed were serious, were taken seriously and were not dismissed by the board lightly," Van Skaik and Osborne respond. "There is clear evidence that the attitudes and behaviors attributed to Mark in the charges are not a part and have not been a part of Mark's life for some time now."

The Acts 29 Network said they were convinced that the nature of the accusations against Pastor Driscoll, "most of which have been confirmed by him," make it "untenable and unhelpful" to keep the pastor and his church in the network. "In taking this action, our prayer is that it will encourage the leadership of Mars Hill to respond in a distinctive and godly manner so that the name of Christ will not continue to be dishonoured," it said.

The Mars Hill BoAA says its decision "is final regarding these charges."

"Again, I am deeply saddened that the A29 board would make such a decisive and divisive conclusion without speaking directly to the board or Mark prior to their public announcement," the letter says.

The board urges church members not to become bitter or angry. "Continue to pray for all involved. Continue to love and lead the people God has brought to your churches. They need a pastor right now and God has given them you!"

According to a letter published on Warren Throckmorton's Patheos blog shown as addressed to "Mark," the Acts 29 board wrote: "Over the past three years, our board and network have been the recipients of countless shots and dozens of fires directly linked to you and what we consider ungodly and disqualifying behavior. We have both publicly and internally tried to support and give you the benefit of the doubt, even when multiple pastors in our network confirmed this behavior.

"In response, we leaned on the Mars Hill Board of Advisors & Accountability to take the lead in dealing with this matter. But we no longer believe the BoAA is able to execute the plan of reconciliation originally laid out. Ample time has been given for repentance, change, and restitution, with none forthcoming. We now have to take another course of action."

Driscoll's dismissal from the network came days after a group of former Mars Hill Church members held a protest outside of the megachurch last weekend. The disaffected members staged the protest to challenge Pastor Driscoll's claim in a videotaped statement that he would not be able to fully reconcile with members who were abruptly dismissed from or displeased with his ministry because "a lot of the people … remain anonymous." That apology was later followed by another statement of regret over strongly-worded and vulgar comments he made 14 years ago on the church's website.

Driscoll's 14-year-old comments, revealed under the name "William Wallace II" and posted in 2000, opened with the words, "We live in a completely pussified nation." Driscoll (as Wallace) condemned the majority of Christian men for being "Promise Keeping homoerotic worship loving mama's boy sensitive emasculated neutered exact male replica evangellyfish."

He added, "It all began with Adam, the first of the pussified nation, who kept his mouth shut and watched everything fall headlong down the slippery slide of hell/feminism when he shut his mouth and listened to his wife who thought Satan was a good theologian when he should have lead her and exercised his delegated authority as king of the planet.

"As a result, he was cursed for listening to his wife and every man since has been his pussified sit quietly by and watch a nation of men be raised by bitter penis envying burned feministed single mothers."

Driscoll ended his remarks by explaining that he expected many women to disagree with him, but "they like Eve should not speak on this matter."