Powered By Blogger

Tuesday, August 30, 2016

BIBLE AND HISTORICAL FACTS ABOUT IRAN


BIBLE AND HISTORICAL FACTS ABOUT IRAN

by David Hocking

Many of our listeners and readers have asked questions about Iran and what we should know about this important and strategic country in our world. The earliest history we have deals with ELAM. At the time of Abraham (about 4000 years ago–Genesis 14) we learn of a confederacy of nations that appears to have as its leader a man named Chedorlaomer who is stated to be the “king of Elam.” In a battle with the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah, Abraham and his 318 trained men pursued them and rescued Lot.
The prophet Isaiah (Isaiah 21:2) mentions Elam and seems to imply a relationship with ancient Media (the Medes). The prophet Jeremiah also refers to Elam in Jeremiah 49:34–39 and refers to their coming destruction as a nation. The dating of this prophecy is at the time of Zedekiah, king of Judah. It perhaps occurred by the domination of Babylon who also destroyed Jerusalem in 586 B.C. The interesting Biblical fact of prophecy in Jeremiah 49:39 is this: “But it shall come to pass in the latter days, that I will bring again the captivity of Elam, saith the LORD.” It is quite possible that this is a reference to the future Day of the Lord.
In the 7th century B.C. a small kingdom was established at Parsumash under Achaemenes whose name is used by history in describing the first Persian dynasty. The son of Achaemenes was a man named Teispes (675–640 B.C.), and apparently his kingdom was dominated by the Medes. After he was given his freedom from the control of the Medes, history records that the weakness of Elam allowed him to gain control of the province of Parsa (modern Fars). It was the Assyrians under Ashurbanipal that put an end to the nation of Elam.
The son of Teispes was Cyrus I who came in contact with the Assyrians as the leader of the Persians. The son of Cyrus I was Cambyses who married the daughter of the Median king Astyges. Their son of Cyrus I was Cambyses who married the daughter of the Median king Astyges. Their son was Cyrus II, known in history as Cyrus the Great (559–530 B.C.), the first great and dominant king of ancient Persia. Cyrus II also conquered the Medes, and defeated his grandfather Astyges, and made the Median capital of Ecbatana his own capital. Cyrus also invaded Asia Minor and defeated Croesus, king of Lydia. He also captured Babylon in 539 B.C. (the official date of the fall of the Babylonian Empire) with little resistance.
The son of Cyrus II was Cambyses II (529–522 B.C.) who conquered Egypt. Cambyses II was succeeded by Darius I, known as Darius the Great (522–486 B.C.) and as Darius Hystaspes (his father was one of the satraps of the Persian Empire). Darius created 20 satrapies (provinces) in order to administrate effectively the growing strength of the Persian Empire. Darius I also moved the capital from Pasagadae to Persepolis. He was a follower of Zoroaster and a worshiper of Ahura Mazda (also followed by Xerxes and Artaxerxes of Biblical history). This is the same king mentioned in the prophecies of Haggai and Zechariah. The Temple project was completed by the Jews in 516 B.C. during his reign.
Darius I was succeeded by his son Xerxes (485–465 B.C.). An inscription at Persepolis lists the nations under his control. He is also the same King Ahashuerus mentioned in the Book of Ester. Following his reign, Artaxerxes Longimanus I came to power (465–424 B.C.) and it was in the 20th year of his reign that the decree to restore the wall of Jerusalem was given to Nehemiah (Nehemiah 2:1).
According to Daniel 9:24–27 that decree to restore the wall was the beginning of a “countdown” to the coming of the Messiah—the prophecy known as the 70 weeks.” But, it was not “weeks” but rather “years” to which the Hebrew word for “seven” was pointing. A prophetic year of 360 days (lunar calendar) multiplied by 483 years brings us to 173, 880 days from the decree to Artaxerxes Longimanus I until the Messiah would come. Two tragic events are mentioned by Daniel that would take place before the final 70th “seven” would begin: the Messiah would be “cut off” and the city and the sanctuary” of Jerusalem would be destroyed. We are still waiting for the beginning of the 70th “seven”—known to Bible students as the coming Day of the Lord (mentioned 25 times in the Bible) or the Tribulation Period (Matthew 24:21–22).
After the reign of Artaxerxes Longimanus I, Darius II came to power (423–405 B.C.) followed by Artaxerxes Mnemon II (404–359 B.C.), Artaxerxes Ochus III (358–338 B.C.), Arses (337–336 B.C.), and Darius III (335–331 B.C.), whose armies were defeated by Alexander the Great in 333 B.C. Upon the death of Alexander in 323 B.C., Persia came under the control of one of Alexander’s generals (Seleucus). According to Daniel 11 there was continual conflict between the Seleucids and the Ptolemies (another general who was given Egypt) over the Land of Israel, a fact that is still remembered by Iran today.
Bible students are quite aware of the presence of Persia in the battle that attacks the Land of Israel (Ezekiel 38–39). Persia seems to be the lead country in that attack (at least they are mentioned first in the list).
This amazing empire of the past continued to be known by the name Persia until 1935 A.D. when its name was changed to Iran. The official modern language of Iran is Persian or Pharsi, an indo-European language written in Arabic characters.
In 1979 A.D. Iran experienced what history calls “The Islamic Revolution.” Shiite Muslims took over the country and installed Sharia Law. Although many Arabs live in parts of the country, Iran is NOT an Arab state. Their connection and support with Arabs is completely based upon the religion of Islam. In many cases throughout the history of Islam, Iran has been a powerful force to oppose the Sunni Muslims of Saudi Arabia who control the holy sites of Islam at Mecca and Median. Iran also experienced eight years of war with its western neighbor Iraq when Saddam Hussein, a Sunni, was in power. Many Shiite Muslims from Iran have populated the southern regions of Iraq and now have become a powerful force in the elected Parliament of Iraq. Historically and traditionally, Iran believes that Iraq belongs to them as well as many other countries in the Middle East (including Israel). They desire the glory of the former Persian Empire (one of the largest empires of history in terms of geography) to be restored.
It should be obvious that Iran (primarily because of oil) is now a major player in the world both politically, economically, and militarily. They are the main suppliers of weapons to Islamic terrorists throughout the Middle East. Most of their weaponry has been made possible by Russia, China, and North Korea.
The Nation of Israel faces serious challenges from the leadership of Iran and its continual threats. The LORD GOD of ISRAEL hears them all and Biblical prophecy will include Iran among all the nations of the world that come against Israel. They will suffer defeat at the hands of the returning Messiah, our blessed Lord Yeshua!

Monday, August 29, 2016

Man A Trinity (Spirit, Soul, Body)


Man A Trinity (Spirit, Soul, Body)

The Christian doctrine of immortality cannot be understood apart from the right conception of the tripartite nature of men. Many think that man is a physical being only. There is a great danger of any man thinking thus of himself. In his desire to satisfy the needs of the body there is the tendency on man’s part to lose sight of the fact that he is immortal. There have been persons who have lived all of their lives either in ignorance or willful neglect of a life after death, but upon their death-bed they suddenly realized that they were more than physical beings.

There is an idea also that prevails largely today that man consists of only two component parts: namely, body and spirit. In the thinking of the writer this view appears to be one that might create confusion in the minds of any Christians. While soul and spirit are so closely related that it is sometimes difficult to distinguish accurately between them, there seems to be only one logical conclusion: namely, that “soul” and “spirit” are not the same. The Bible does make a distinction.

Man is a triune being because he is created in the image of God. “God said, Let us make man in Our image” (Genesis 1:26). We know that God is a Trinity. The Holy Trinity is clearly set forth in the Apostle Paul’s benediction that closed his Second Corinthian Epistle: “The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the communion of the Holy Ghost, be with you all. Amen” (2 Corinthians 13:14). Our Lord Himself said, in what we call “The Great Commission”: “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” (Matthew 28:19). Created in the image of God, man is likewise a trinity. He has a spiritual nature that is separate and distinct from the body in which it dwells.

The two following passages from the Bible clearly establish the fact that man is a triune being composed of spirit, soul, and body:

I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ (1 Thessalonians 5:23).

For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow (body), and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart (Hebrews 4:12).

In spite of the erroneous teaching of “Jehovah’s Witnesses” and of other false sects that “no man has a soul,” the Bible states emphatically that man was created a trinity of spirit, soul, and body even as the eternal God is Himself a trinity of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. The trinity of man is an essential part of the image relationship between him and God. Life is not ultimately physical and the body is not the whole man. And we might add that neither the body in itself, nor the soul in itself, nor the spirit in itself makes up the whole man, but he is “spirit and soul and body.” This must be seriously considered and definitely agreed to before we can comprehend with any accuracy the subject of life after death. In this opening chapter we shall confine our material to the spirit and the soul inasmuch as the body will be considered in succeeding chapters on the resurrection.

The Spirit

The word “spirit” when used in the Scriptures has several meanings. Whenever the word “Spirit” appears used with a capital letter, it has but one meaning. It is the name of the third Person of the Trinity, the Holy Spirit of God. The word “spirit” spelled with a small letter may have one of several different meanings. It can have direct reference to the spirit of man which is as much a part of the tripartite nature of man as the Spirit of the living God is a Person of the Holy Trinity. Or it can indicate an evil spirit such as any agent of the Devil. We will confine ourselves here to the Biblical usage of the word only as it relates to the spirit of man, one of the three constituent parts of his being.

The threefold nature of man might be illustrated in several ways. Dr. Clarence Larkin uses three circles (Rightly Dividing The Word, page 86). The outer circle stands for the body of man, the middle circle for the soul, and the inner for the spirit. At this point it will be well to quote a portion from Dr. Larkin’s book:

In the outer circle the ‘Body’ is shown as touching the Material world through the five senses of ‘Sight,’ ‘Smell,’ ‘Hearing,’ ‘Taste’ and ‘Touch.’

The Gates to the ‘Soul’ are ‘Imagination,’ ‘Conscience,’ ‘Memory,’ ‘Reason’ and the ‘Affections.’

The “Spirit” receives impressions of outward and material things through the soul. The spiritual faculties of the ‘Spirit’ are ‘Faith,’ ‘Hope,’ ‘Reverence,’ ‘Prayer’ and ‘Worship.’

In his unfallen state the ‘Spirit’ of man was illuminated from Heaven, but when the human race fell in Adam, sin closed the window of the Spirit, pulled down the curtain, and the chamber of the spirit became a death chamber and remains so in every unregenerate heart, until the Life and Light giving power of the Holy Spirit floods that chamber with the Life and Light giving power of the new life in Christ Jesus.

It develops then that the spirit of man, being the sphere of God-consciousness, is the inner or private office of man where the work of regeneration takes place. Dr. James R. Graham says that the main theatre of the Holy Spirit’s activity in man, and the part of man’s nature with which He has peculiar affinity, is the spirit of man. The Apostle Paul gives us the Word of God on this, a passage that is sadly neglected. Quoting from the sixty-fourth chapter of the book of the Prophet Isaiah, Paul wrote:

But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love Him.

A great many people stop here, content to remain in ignorance. However, Paul continues:

But God hath revealed them unto us by His Spirit; for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God.

For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? Even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God (1 Corinthians 2:9-11).

Man in his unregenerate state comes to know the things of man by the operator of “the spirit of man” which is in him. If I have a will to know certain scientific facts, by my human spirit I am enabled to investigate, think, and weigh evidence. If I set myself to the task, I may become a scientist of world-renown and of great accomplishments. However, my human spirit is “limited to the things of man.” If I want to know about the things of God, my dead and dormant spirit is not able to know them.

The natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God; for they are foolishness unto him; neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned (1 Corinthians 2:14).

The human spirit requires “the spark of regeneration” before there is an understanding of the things of God. Man’s spiritual nature must be renewed before there is a true conception of Godliness. Only one thing stands as a guard at the door of man’s spirit, and that is his own will. When the will is surrendered, the Holy Spirit takes up His abode in the spirit of man. And when that transaction takes place we will know it, for, says Paul:

The Spirit Himself (meaning the Holy Spirit) beareth witness with our spirit, that we are children of God (Romans 8:16 R.V.).

Many people confess that they get nothing out of the Bible even though they attend church and read their Bibles regularly. Perhaps they do not know that they are not regenerated and that they need to yield their will to the Spirit of God so that He can renew their human spirits. The deep things of God never will be understood by the world outside of Jesus Christ. Our Lord warned His disciples,

Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine (Matthew 7:6).

The spirit of the unregenerate man has no more capacity to appreciate the things of God than a dog has to appreciate holy things, or a hog a genuine pearl necklace. We read that “The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire” (2 Peter 2:22). This they did because the dog was a dog and the sow was a sow. No amount of religion or church activity can change the spirit of the unregenerate man. “Remember,” says Dr. G. Campbell Morgan, “if out of false charity or pity you allow men of material ideals and worldly wisdom to touch holy things, to handle the pearls of the Kingdom, presently they will turn and rend you. This is the whole history of Christendom’s ruin, in the measure in which Christendom is ruined. We gave holy things to dogs. We cast the pearls of the Kingdom before swine.” The ministry of Christ’s Church dare not be entrusted to any man who has not been born again, for “That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit” (John 3:6).

The Bible says; “There is a spirit in man; and the inspiration of the Almighty giveth them understanding” (Job 32:8). Here we are told that it is the spirit of man that is given understanding. The materialist tells us that the spirit of man is the air that he breathes, and that man’s body is all there is to his personality. Such is not the case. The spirit of man is his personality and it is that which differentiates him from the lower animal creation. If “spirit” meant merely “breath,” God certainly would not deal with it as a personality. He is called “The God of the spirits of all flesh” (Numbers 16:22), and “the Father of spirits” (Hebrews 12:9). It is by his spirit that the Christian both serves and worships God. Paul testified: “For God is my witness, Whom I serve with my spirit in the Gospel” (Romans 1:9). Jesus said: “God is a spirit; and they that worship Him must worship Him in spirit and in truth” (John 4:24).

The Soul

Man not only has a living soul but he is a living soul. The Bible says: “And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living soul” (Genesis 2:7). We must be careful not to confound that which is truly spiritual and that which is merely soulish or psychical. We have seen that the spirit of man is the sphere of activity where the Holy Spirit operates in regeneration. Just so is the soul the sphere of activity where Satan operates making his appeal to the affections and emotions of man.

Satan knows full well that he dominates the psychical or the soulish man. Therefore he does not care if a man goes to a church where the Spirit of God is not in evidence. He knows that his victim is a creature of emotions, and it matters not if the emotions are stirred to sentimentalism or even to tears, just so long as man’s spirit does not come in contact with God’s Holy Spirit. Personally, I believe that Satan would rather have man go to a modernistic church where there is false worship than he would have him go to a house of prostitution. The soul is the seat of the passions, the feelings, and the desires of man; and Satan is satisfied if he can master these. F. W. Grant has said that the soul is the seat of the affections, right or wrong, of love, hate, lusts, and even the appetites of the body.

Hamor said to Jacob, “The soul of my son Shechem longeth for your daughter” (Genesis 34:8). Of David and Jonathan it is written: “The soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul” (1 Samuel 18:1). These passages show the soul to be the seat of the affections. But as the soul loves, so it also hates. We read of those “that are hated of David’s soul” (2 Samuel 5:8).

It is in the soul where fleshly lusts, desires, and appetites arise:

Abstain from fleshly lusts which war against the soul (Peter 2:11).

As cold waters to a thirsty soul, so is good news from a far country (Proverbs 25:25).

It shall be even as when a hungry man dreameth, and behold, he eateth; but he awaketh, and his soul is empty; or as when a thirsty man dreameth, and behold, he drinketh; but he awaketh, and behold, he is faint, and his soul hath appetite (Isaiah 29:8).

The soul of man, that is, his affections and desires, are never directed Godward until after the spirit has become regenerated. Man can never love God nor the things of God until he is born from above. He may have a troubled conscience or be so stirred emotionally that he may weep bitterly, and still remain dead in trespasses and in sins. We do not feel that we are guilty of judging men when we state that some who have answered an altar call and shed tears never were born again. Man’s desires and affections are turned toward God when he realizes his sinful condition and God’s grace in salvation. When the Spirit of God illuminates the spirit of a man with divine light and life, that man begins to yield his affections and faculties to God.

The Virgin Mary said; “My soul doth magnify the Lord, And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour” (Luke 1:46, 47). She could not extol the Lord in her soul until she had recognized God in her spirit as her Saviour. The initial triumph is in the spirit when Jesus Christ is acknowledged as personal Saviour.

In that immortal classic of the Psalms, David says: “He restoreth my soul” (Psalm 23:3). The Hebrew word translated “restoreth” is said to mean quite literally “turneth back.” At no time had David lost his salvation, but there were times when his affections and desires were turned from the Lord, as in the case of his sin with Bathsheba. Having become one of the Divine Shepherd’s flock, he testified: “The Lord turneth back my soul.” The Christian who is enjoying unbroken communion with his Lord will then be able to say, “Bless the Lord, O my soul, and all that is within me, bless His holy name” (Psalm 103:1).

Sunday, August 28, 2016

Destiny of Infants at Death


Destiny of Infants at Death
From Dr. PaulN.Benware

QUESTION: “What happens to infants when they die? Do they go to heaven or is it uncertain as to what happens to them?”

ANSWER: What happens when an infant dies is far from being simply an academic matter, but it is as intensely personal as anything could be. To answer this specific question properly, it is essential to get the broad picture and there are several things to consider.

First, God loves His human creation, including infants, and wants what is best for them. He wants all people to be with Him forever and to enjoy Him and to enjoy what He has provided for them. When God became flesh in the person of Jesus Christ, we do witness Him demonstrating a special fondness for children (Matt. 18:3-10; 19:13-15; Mark 10:13-16; Luke 18:15-17). The Luke account specifically includes “babies” as ones being brought to Jesus. These verses show that Jesus readily accepted these little ones (laying His hands on them was a sign of that) and saw them of great value, unlike His own disciples who at that point didn’t share His view. To Jesus, little children are excellent examples of the fact that simple trust is what brings a person to receive God’s eternal life. A proud person who is self-sufficient will not admit their need of a savior. Jesus had a special affection for these little ones.

Second, it is important to recognize that if God does take an infant to heaven at the death of that infant, it is not because the baby is innocent. The baby may well be cute and very precious to be sure, but biblically that baby is not innocent. The Bible is clear that a child is born guilty. They are sinful before God even before they commit any specific sins (we cannot be sure how young a child can be in order to commit personal sin). The Apostle Paul is quite clear, however, that everyone on this planet stands guilty before God (Romans 1:18-3:20, especially 3:9-10, 23). Other scriptures point out that we are sinners at birth and separated from God because of it (Psa. 51:5; 58:3; 143:2; Rom. 5:12-20; Eph. 2:1-3). These and other verses clearly teach that infants too are guilty before God because of inherited sin (sin nature) passed on from their parents who are also sinful, by nature and by act.

So, if God brings the infant to heaven it is essential that the issue of sinful guilt is dealt with in a way that satisfies the absolute standard of God’s holiness. They are not saved because of their own righteousness, innocence or merit. They are saved, like everyone else who is saved, based completely and only on the redemptive work of Christ on the cross. So the question is: did Christ’s death on the cross take care of the guilt of infants. The evidence of Scripture is YES IT DOES.

Jesus died on the cross; His death took care of the sin problem completely. He made a full and complete payment for all the sins of all mankind. There was no aspect of sin that was not righteously, judicially, completely paid for (John 3:16; 2 Cor. 5:19-21; 1 John 2:1-2; Heb. 2:9; 9:11-14, 25-28; 10:10-14). So that guilt, possessed by all, including infants, was paid for on the cross. This settles the most critical matter of all; that of God being able to righteously bring someone to heaven. But, in order to receive eternal life and the forgiveness of sins, a person must place their trust (faith) in Jesus the God-man, the one and only savior. The work on the cross, to be applied, must be accepted by the individual. We are declared righteous on the basis of faith in Christ alone (Gal. 2:16).

What separates infants from the rest mankind is that they cannot make moral choices, since they do not have the knowledge and understanding about right and wrong. They do not have the capacity to accept or reject the gospel. They, therefore, do not fit into the category of Romans 1:18-3:20 where Paul speaks of the judgment of eternal death that is coming on everyone who does not listen to the gospel and turn to Jesus Christ for eternal life. The case is strong, therefore, that since the guilt of sin has been totally paid for, and since infants cannot choose, that God justly brings these to heaven. (I would also suggest that those people of any chronological age who mentally do not have the ability to discern right from wrong, and cannot choose to accept or reject the gospel, are also covered by Christ’s work on the cross).

Third, the Scriptures do give us the account of the death of King David’s infant son (found in 2 Samuel 12). When the baby boy died, David who had been seeking God intently, ceased praying and fasting, which surprised David’s servants. David then explained, “But now that he has died; why should I fast? Can I bring him back again? I shall go to him, but he will not return to me” (12:23). It is the opinion of some interpreters that all David was saying was that his son cannot come back into the realm of the living, but he (David) would go into the realm of the dead. While that point is quite true, the context would point to something more to David’s statement. David says that he would go to him, not that he would go to where he was; that is, the realm of the dead. It was hardly comfort or consolation to David that he would die someday and be dead like his son. But to be with that son someday would bring very real consolation to the grieving heart of David who expected to be reunited with his baby son. Everyone would agree that at death David would be with the Lord. So the point is that David, who is headed for heaven, would again be with that son. This, of course, means that the little boy who died, being just 7 days old, would be with his father, David, when David died. This strongly points to the infant going to heaven.

We wish that there were many more scriptures which would talk about this subject, but what God has given to us gives us great comfort that these little ones that Jesus cared about and died for are with the Lord. It is, therefore, not simply wishful thinking or sentimentalism, when we state that INFANTS WHO DIE GO TO BE WITH THE LORD JESUS CHRIST and will enjoy Him forever.

Dr. Paul Benware

Saturday, August 27, 2016

A COMPARISON OF THE OLIVET DISCOURSE AND THE BOOK OF REVELATION



A COMPARISON OF THE OLIVET DISCOURSE AND THE BOOK OF REVELATION
Dr. Ron J. Bigalke Jr.
Author, Lecturer, Pastor
The purpose of this presentation is to demonstrate parallel events between the Olivet Discourse and the Book of Revelation in a sequential format. Correlation of each event of the Olivet Discourse with its timing in the Book of Revelation informs our understanding of the current age (in regards to signs of the end times or stage setting), and interpretation of the return of Christ, and the judgment at that time.
Sequential and Successive, not Merely Recapitulation
There is an expanding development of the judgments in the Book of Revelation. In other words, there is a sequential relationship between the seal, trumpet, and bowl judgments. The series of judgments are not parallel and simultaneous in the sense of recapitulation. Each series of judgments is best interpreted as generally chronological to its antecedent. This means the seventh seal judgment leads specifically into the series of the seven trumpet judgments, and the seventh trumpet judgment leads specifically into the series of the seven bowl judgments.
The Beginning of the Tribulation (Olivet Discourse and Revelation)
There are two differing views among premillennialists as to the timing of prophetic fulfillment of the birth pangs prophesied in the Olivet Discourse. In his commentary on the Gospel of Matthew, Dr. Walvoord referred to premillennial interpreters who understand 24:4-14 “as a unit, describing the general characteristics of the age leading up to the end, while at the same time recognizing that the prediction of the difficulties, which will characterize the entire period between the first and second coming of Christ, are fulfilled in an intensified form as the age moves on to its conclusion.” In other words, 24:4-14 are “general signs” whereas 24:15-26 are “specific signs.” Generally, this would mean “these [general] signs have been at least partially fulfilled in the present age and have characterized the period between the first and second coming of Christ.”1 However, even within this view, there are some who interpret 24:4-8 as general signs of the period between the first and second coming of Christ; therefore, 24:9-14 would be events concerning the first half of the tribulation.2
It is not easy to argue that the birth pangs (false messiahs, wars, famines, and earthquakes) have been lacking in the present age. However, the relation of the disciple’s questions in the Olivet Discourse to parallels in Revelation 6 indicate that these signs
1 John F. Walvoord, Matthew: Thy Kingdom Come (Chicago: Mood Press, 1974; reprint, Grand Rapids: Kregel, 1998), 183.
2 Arnold G. Fruchtenbaum, The Footsteps of the Messiah (Tustin, CA: Ariel Ministries Press, 1983), 440.
1

cannot refer to the current church age. Furthermore, these signs are unique to a period of which the world has never known. Since these signs are events which fit contextually with the tribulation period, they should not be cited as fulfilled (in any sense) in the current age.
For example, famines and plagues are offered as proof of fulfillment, but the truth is they have been occurring throughout the course of human history for thousands of years. The worst famines in history occurred in North China (1876-79) and India (1876- 1878). In North China alone, “deaths by hunger, violence, and subsequent disease are estimated at between 9 million and 13 million.”3 The worst case of pestilence was the Plague of Justinian (AD 500-650). The effects of the plague left three of every five inhabitants dead. The decline of the city of Constantinople, and the Byzantine Empire, dates from the Plague of Justinian. Not until the ninth century did the Empire begin to recover. “Recurring epidemics of bubonic plague,” the Black Death, “killed as many as 100 million people.” From 1347-51 “the disease affected every level of society, killing an estimated 75 million people, depopulating more than 200,000 villages, and reducing the European population by perhaps as much as one-quarter” in Western Europe.4 None can deny the devastation of these select examples, but they will pale in comparison to those of the tribulation. No current frame of reference exists for the judgments and signs of the tribulation. If the events of 24:4-14 (or 24:4-8) are general signs of disasters as ancient as the human race—representing familiarly distressing scenes of conquest, war, famine, and death—then what is different with the breaking of the first four seal judgments? Obviously, nothing would be different.5
Another premillennial interpretation of 24:4-14 would understand these prophesied events as occurring solely in the first half of the tribulation. Gaebelein wrote, “The point which we wish to make is the following: If this is the correct interpretation, if Matthew xxiv :4-14 refers to the beginning of that coming end of the age and if Revelation vi refers to the same beginning of the end and that which follows the sixth chapter leads us on into the great tribulation, then there must be a perfect harmony between that part of the Olivet discourse contained in Matthew xxiv and the part of Revelation beginning with the sixth chapter. And such is indeed the case.”6
The First Half of the Tribulation (Matthew 24:4–20)
In Matthew 24:4-5, 11; Mark 13:5-6, and Luke 21:8, false messiahs and prophets are mentioned; and, in Revelation 6:2, we read of the rider on the white horse. Revelation 6:2 indicates four significant factors of the horseman of the first seal: (1) the color of the
3 James C. Cornell Jr., The Great International Disaster Book (New York: Pocket Books, 1979),
155.
4 Ibid., 138-84.
5 Sigve K. Tonstad, Saving God’s Reputation: The Theological Function of Pistis Iesou in the Cosmic Narratives of Revelation (New York: T. & T. Clark, 2006), 132.
6 Arno C. Gaebelein, The Gospel of Matthew: An Exposition, 2 vols. (New York City: Our Hope, 1910), 2:182.
2

horse is white; (2) the rider holds a bow; (3) the rider wears a stevfano"; and, (4) the rider’s conquering according to the verb nikavw.
As opposed to the horseman of the first seal being identified as Antichrist, it would seem best to understand the first seal referring to false messiahs and prophets.
The second white horse rider consistently has a sword throughout the Book of Revelation (1:16; 2:12, 16; 19:15, 21); therefore, such divergence with the first white horse rider results in an obvious distinction.
After giving a warning of many false messiahs, Jesus used a future tense (mellw) to indicate that at the time of the false messiahs you will be hearing of wars and rumors of wars (Matt 24:4–6). This appears to be an obvious parallel to Matthew 24:6-7a; Mark 13:7-8a; Luke 21:9-10 where we read about “wars and rumors of wars,” and nation rising against nation, and kingdom against kingdom.” A false peace and security, along with religious apostasy (the false messiahs inspire their devotees to insurrection and wars), characterize the beginning of the tribulation that will develop into multiple wars near and away from the land of Israel. All this is yet future and parallels John’s description of the second seal horseman in Revelation 6:3-4.
The third seal horseman, or black horse rider, brings famine (a foreboding indication of the pale horse rider). The third seal will likely occur shortly after the second seal judgment since famine often follows open warfare.
The fourth seal horseman, the pale horse rider, brings death. This judgment parallels the synoptic Olivet discourses that prophesy famine, pestilences, and death as part of the beginning of birth pangs. Luke simply mentioned famines, whereas John’s usage of thanatos would include pestilences and death in general.
“For thus says the Lord God, ‘How much more when I send My four sever judgments against Jerusalem: sword, famine, wild beasts, and plague to cut off man and beast from it!” (Ezek 14:21). These same four figures are prophesied as God’s wrath in several other passages (cf. Lev 26:21-28; Numb 11:33; 16:46; 25:8-11; Deut 11:17; 28:20-26; 32:22- 25; Jer 15:1-9; 16:4-11; 19:7-9; Ezek 5:11-17; 6:11-12; 7:3-15). The tribulation commences with the outpouring of God’s wrath in the seal judgments, followed by the trumpet judgments, and concluding with the bowl judgments. The judgments are sequential and progressive, which means there is no break in the outpouring of God’s wrath, and intensify as they are cast upon the earth.
The Birth Pangs
This is in keeping with the analogy of birth pangs, since such pains do not occur at the beginning of pregnancy, but at the end. In the same manner, the signs of Matthew 24:4- 14 do not occur during the current church dispensation, but only during the tribulation immediately before Christ’s return. The Olivet Discourse will instruct Israel and Gentile saints, during the tribulation, that the events of verses 5–6 are not yet the end. It is just the beginning of birth pangs before being able to straighten up and lift up [their] heads, because [their] redemption is drawing near (24:8; Luke 21:28).
The Greek word, wjdivn, may be a technical term, as BAG define it as “of the ‘Messianic woes’, the terrors and torments traditionally viewed as prelude to the coming of the Messianic Age . . . associated with the appearance of the Son of Man at the end of
3
history, as the beginning of the (end-time) woes ajrch wjdivnon Mt 24: 8; Mk 13: 8.”7 The birth pangs of the first half of the tribulation are the beginning of the greater birth pangs in the second half of the tribulation. The entire seven-year tribulation is the period of birth pangs, as Jeremiah 30:6-7 indicates, “‘Ask now, and see if a male can give birth. Why do I see every man, with his hands on his loins, as a woman in childbirth? And why have all faces turned pale? ‘Alas! for that day is great, there is none like it; and it is the time of Jacob’s distress, but he will be saved from it.”
The seven-year tribulation is clearly divided chronologically in the Books of Daniel and Revelation, and characteristically in the eschatological discourses of the synoptics, that is the beginning (less intense experiences) and the more frequent and intense experiences of the tribulation period. Drawing from extra-biblical sources, Raphael Patai devoted an entire chapter to “The Pangs of Time” and concluded,
The pangs of the Messianic times are imagined as heavenly as well as earthly sources and expressions. From Above, awesome cosmic cataclysms will be visited upon the earth. . . . All this will lead to internal decay, demoralization, and even apostasy. Things will come to such a head that people will despair of Redemption. This will last seven years. And then, unexpectedly, the Messiah will come.
Because of this gloomy picture of the beginning of the Messianic era, which by Talmudic times was firmly believed in, some sages expressed the wish not to see the Messiah. . . . In any case, both the people and its religious leaders continued to hope for the coming of the Messiah.8
The Jewish understanding of the birth pangs of the Messianic times is certainly consistent with the sequence of the Olivet Discourse and the Book of Revelation. The birth pangs are additional evidence that supports the concept of Matthew 24:4-14 (and the parallels in Markan and Lukan discourses) as indicating events of the first half of the tribulation, which is also parallel to the four horseman of Revelation 6:1-8.
The eschatological discourses of the synoptics warn of persecution and martyrdom during the tribulation (Matt 24:9-10, 12; Mark 13:9, 11-13; Luke 21:11a-19). Mark and Luke stated the comfort given to the faithful during the tribulation is that the Holy Spirit will give them the words to speak. As martyrdom (24:9) is also the fifth seal, John recorded the prayer of those seeking justice from God.
Earthquakes are frequent throughout the Book of Revelation as judgment is about to intensify (Rev 6:12; 8:5; 11:13, 19; 16:18). The sixth seal should be correlated around the time of the abomination of desolation at the midpoint of the tribulation.9 It seems that
7 William F. Bauer, William F. Arndt, and F. Wilbur Gingrich [BAGD], A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 2nd ed., rev. F. Wilbur Gingrich and Frederick W. Danker (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979), 895.
8 Raphael Patai, The Messiah Texts (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1979), 95-96.
9 The reader should note the corollary passages in Daniel 9:26–27; Matthew 24:15; Mark 13:14– 19; Luke 21:23; 23:29-30; cf. Isa 2:12-22; Hos 10:1-8 (Luke speaks in positive terms what Matthew speaks in negative terms; one speaks in terms of woe and the other speaks in terms of blessing). Revelation 6:12– 16, as well, correlates the above verses and supports the view that the abomination of desolation occurs around the breaking of the sixth seal. This interpretation would also regard the judgments as sequential (e.g., the seventh seal is the seven trumpets and the seventh trumpet is the seven bowls).
4

the sixth seal is used to introduce the great tribulation (24:21), or the second half of the tribulation which begins with the abomination of desolation.
The Seal Judgments
Both Rosenthal and Van Kampen gave attention to the similarities between the events of Matthew 24:5-9 and the first five seals of the Apocalypse (Rev 6:1-8). However, their argument is that the first five seals (6:1-11) are not the wrath of God, but that of man through the Antichrist (similar to midtribulationists).10
Both Rosenthal11 and Van Kampen12 argued that God’s wrath does not begin until after the sixth seal. After the cosmic signs of Revelation 6:12-14, verses 15-17 provide the reaction of the kings of the earth and the great men and the commanders and the rich and the strong and every slave and free man. They will cry to the mountains and to the rocks, “Fall on us and hide us from the presence of Him who sits on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb; for the great day of their wrath has come; and who is able to stand?” A plain reading of Scripture here should cause one to conclude that the great day of God’s wrath has already come and is present during the sixth seal.
Since pre-wrath rapturists do not believe God’s wrath begins until the seventh seal, they must argue, “the aorist tense is, generally speaking, timeless.”13 Rosenthal wrote, “ . . . the phrase, ‘the great day of his wrath is come’ refers, not to a past event, but to an event about to occur, and that in concert with the opening of the seventh seal.”14 Following the sixth seal, God’s wrath “is an event that is on the threshold of happening— a future event soon to occur.”15 The aorist, h\lqen, in 6:17 is in the indicative mood which would confirm the reality of the action (God’s wrath) from the standpoint of the world leaders.
The aorist is not timeless as the pre-wrath view requires; rather, the time of action is past. Non-indicative moods may indicate the kind of action as opposed to the time of action. Dana and Mantey stated, “It has no essential temporal significance, its time relations being found only in the indicative, where it is used as past and hence augmented. . . . The aorist signifies nothing as to completeness, but simply presents the action as attained. It states the fact of the action or event without regard to its duration.”16 Robertson concurred, “It is true that in the expression of past time in the indicative and with all the other moods, the aorist is the tense used as a matter of course. . . .”17 Wallace acquiesced, “In the indicative, the aorist usually indicates past time with reference to the time of speaking (thus, ‘absolute time’). . . . Outside the indicative and participle, time is not a feature of the aorist.”18
10 Marvin J. Rosenthal, The Pre-Wrath Rapture of the Church (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1990), 147-51; Robert D. Van Kampen, The Rapture Question Answered (Grand Rapids: Revell, 1997), 139-52.
11 Rosenthal, Pre-Wrath Rapture, 167.
12 Van Kampen, Rapture Question, 164.
13 Ibid., 153.
14 Rosenthal, Pre-Wrath Rapture, 167.
15 Van Kampen, Rapture Question, 154.
16 H. E. Dana and Julius R. Mantey, A Manual Grammar of the Greek New Testament (New York:
Macmillan, 1927), 193.
17 A. T. Robertson, A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research
(Nashville: Broadman Press, 1934), 831.
18 Daniel B. Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1996), 555.
5

“This Generation” and Time Texts
Matthew 24:34, 36 (cf. Rev)
Preterists claim to place primary emphasis upon the demonstrative pronouns in verses 34 and 36 of Matthew 24, but only a futurist interpretation seeks to understand those pronouns within the context. Demonstrative pronouns help locate and identify nouns or other pronouns. Pronouns substitute nouns when the nouns they replace can be understood from the context. They also indicate whether they are replacing a singular or plural tense and identify in what location (near/far) the speaker places himself in relation to the object.
English Demonstrative Pronouns Pronoun Tense Location
In Greek, there are two demonstrative pronouns. Frequently, these demonstratives will be used independent of a noun and carry the intensity of a substantive. The most common use of the demonstrative pronoun is with a noun and carrying the strength of an adjective. In other words, the noun will contain the article and the demonstrative pronoun can be found in the predicate position but never in the attributive position (e.g., oJ uiJoς ou|toς or ou|toς oJ uiJoς).
Greek Demonstrative Pronouns Pronoun Tense Location
The purpose of demonstrative pronouns in both English and Greek grammar is to help identify where the speaker places himself in relation to the object. Central to preterist eschatology is a first century fulfillment of the Olivet Discourse. The preterist interpretation of the Olivet Discourse requires Jesus to place Himself in a relatively near relation to the events of Matthew 24—25. If this is the scenario, as the preterists contend, then Jesus would use ou|toÏ‚ and ou|toi in order to indicate relatively near events.
In four verses, Jesus used the relatively distant demonstrative pronouns: ejkeivnaiς tai'ς hJmeraiς (24:19); aiJ hJmevrai ejkei'nai (24:22); tw'n hJmerw'n ejkeivnwn (24:29); and, th'ς hJmevraς ejkeivnhς (24:36).19 When speaking of His coming, Jesus used the relatively
19 Perhaps a fifth reference could be added in 24:38 (tai'ς hJmevraiς [ejkeivnaiς]) due to the likelihood that the pronoun was omitted accidentally. Both the UBS and Nestle-Aland include ejkeivnaiς in
6
this
singular
near
that
singular
far
these
plural
near
those
plural
far
ou|toς
singular
near
ou|toi
plural
near
ejkei'noς
singular
far
ejkei'nai
plural
far

distant demonstrative pronouns. When Jesus spoke of the events that will occur prior to His coming, He usef the relatively near demonstrative pronouns since this would fit His perspective at the time of His coming: tau'ta (24:8) and ou{twς (24:33). In other words, Jesus was speaking of His future coming, and then used the near demonstratives to describe the eschatological events that will precede His future coming.
When Jesus said, “Truly I say to you, this [au{th] generation will not pass away until all these [tau'ta] things take place” (24:34), He was referring to the same generation that belong in the distance (eschatologically). By identifying the demonstrative pronouns, it becomes clear that Jesus was referring to the generation that witnesses the events of the Olivet Discourse with His coming in a future time. If Jesus intended to speak of a first century fulfillment then He would have used the relatively future demonstrative, ejkei'nai, for the events that would occur among the generation that would witness His coming. In other words, Jesus was not using relatively far demonstratives to describe what He prophecied of Himself in relatively near demonstratives, as He stepped into the future from His present earthly location. Only the generation witnessing all the events prophesied in the Olivet Discourse will be the generation to witness His return. Commenting on the parallel passage to Matthew 24 in Luke 21, Lukan scholar Darrell Bock assented:
What Jesus is saying is that the generation that sees the beginning of the end, also sees its end. When the signs come, they will proceed quickly; they will not drag on for many generations.
Nonetheless, in the discourse’s prophetic context, the remark comes after making comments about the nearness of the end to certain signs. As such it is the issue of the signs that controls the passage’s force, making this view likely. If this view is correct, Jesus says that when the signs of the beginning of the end come, then the end will come relatively quickly, within a generation.20
Preterists insist that they are defending the Bible against attacks from liberals such as Bertrand Russell21 by claiming a first century fulfillment of Matthew 24. Because, in their view, the Olivet Discourse and Revelation refer to the same time period, preterists use the words shortly and near in Revelation 1:1, 3 to date the events of Matthew 24 and Revelation prior to A.D. 70.
Preterists simply are not exegeting the texts as they claim to be doing. BAGD defines the adverb tacos as follows: “speed, quickness, swiftness, haste.”22 The Apostle John uses the adverb tacus with ercomai (“to come”) in Revelation 2:16; 3:11; 11:14; 22:7, 12, 20 meaning “quick, swift, speedy.”23 All six uses of tacus in Revelation mean “without delay, quickly, at once.”24 Blass-Debrunner concurred by
brackets. Metzger rated its inclusion with a “C” grade. See Bruce M. Metzger, A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, 2nd ed. (Stuttgart: United Bible Societies, 1994), 52.
20 Darrell L. Bock, Luke 9:51—24:53 (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1996), 1691-92.
21 R. C. Sproul, The Last Days According to Jesus (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1998), 13, 56. 22 BAGD, 807.
23 Ibid.
24 Ibid.
7

classifying tacus as “an adverb of manner,” not “an adverb of time.”25 Therefore, the text in Matthew 24:34 (and Revelation 1:1, 3) describes the manner in which tribulational events will occur, and not their timing.
Although Matthew 24:34 is the preterist mantra, the reference here to this generation is a difficult passage to correlate with the preterist system. Preterists seek to demonstrate that whenever this generation is used in the Gospels, it refers to the first century generation. Additionally, Christ was speaking to the disciples prior to His crucifixion. In Matthew 23:36, this generation refers to those who would witness the destruction of the Temple in AD 70. Dispensationalists should agree with the last statements, but disagree with the first statement.
Dispensationalists generally interpret this generation to speak of those who will not only witness all these things of Matthew 24 (Luke 21:32 reads, all things), which includes the literal and physical return of Jesus Christ. It seems the best way to understand gevnhtai is as an ingressive aorist, which means an event has occurred but the emphasis is on initiation. The destruction of the Temple should be understood from its initiation, which would bear the meaning “begin to take place.” The prophetic chronology for all these things of Matthew 24:34 would begin with the first century generation, but not find final fulfillment until the second coming.
The Judgment of Gentiles (Matthew 24:36–25:46)
The One Taken and The Other Left (24:36-41)
In Matthew 24:36, Jesus said, “But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father alone. In 24:36-41, Jesus will provide answers as to what the conditions will be like when He does return. “For the coming of the Son of Man will be just like the days of Noah (24:37). In the same way, unbelievers did not believe judgment would be coming upon them in the days of Noah, so will the response of the unbelievers be during the tribulation even though they will experience the wrath of God. One will be taken, and one will be left (24:39b). The unbelievers do not truly believe judgment is coming.
In keeping with the context of tribulational events, the one taken and the other left in Matthew 24:37–41 is a reference to the separation that will take place when Christ returns to earth. Israel is not included here since her judgment is the tribulation. The one taken is in judgment in death at the second coming and the other left enters into the millennial kingdom. The response of Jesus to the disciples’ questioning (Luke 17:37; cf. Rev 19:17–18) accurately fits this interpretation alone. In other words, the disciples question when the restoration of Israel will take place and God will judge all her enemies. Jesus has already answered questions in regards to Israel and is now dealing with the judgment of Gentiles.
The Olivet Discourse deals with Christ returning to the earth in judgment before establishing the messianic kingdom. The emphasis does not have to do with the
25 Friedrich Blass and Albert Debrunner, A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, trans. and rev. Robert W. Funk (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961), 55–57.
8

unexpectedness of the time of the Rapture; rather the focus is on unexpected judgment just like the days of Noah (Matt 24:37).26
The wide-ranging progression of events (times and seasons), leading to the day of the Lord, will come like a thief for the unbeliever (cf. 2 Pet 3:3-10). In contrast, the day of the Lord does not overtake the church. For God has not destined us [the Christian] for wrath [the day of the Lord], but for obtaining salvation [deliverance] through our Lord Jesus Christ, who died for us, that whether we are awake [the watchful Christian] or asleep [the unwatchful Christian], we may live together with Him (1 Thess 5:2, 9; cf. 1:10).
The coming of the Son of man in Matthew 24:3, 27, 30, 37, 39, 42, and 44 refers to Christ’s return to execute judgment and establish His kingdom on earth. The messianic title Son of Man never refers to the church; it is a title for the Davidic King who will reign on earth from Jerusalem (Dan 7:13–14). Emphasis then lies upon the signs of approximation preceding the coming of the Son of Man and the parable from the fig tree is given (24:30, 32). When a future generation witnesses all the signs of Matthew 24, then the coming of the Son of Man is approaching, right at the door (24:33).
If there is still any doubt that this coming is for judgment, Luke 17:34–37 must be read for it answers as to what place one will be taken and the other will be left. Jesus responds, Where the body is, there also will the vultures be gathered. In other words, God takes them in death and feeds their carcasses to the vultures. Matthew 24:28 indicates the timing of this event will be after the coming of the Son of Man (cf. Rev 19:17–19). At the second coming, some unbelievers are taken in judgment and put to death, thereby beginning the process that Matthew 25 reveals will be the destiny of all goats before the establishment of the millennial kingdom.
The Parable of the Householder (24:42-51)
The parable of the householder (cf. Luke 12:41-48) contrasts the eternal destinies of the faithful and sensible slave and the evil slave when Christ returns to earth at the end of the tribulation. One position is that “the Greek text makes it plain that only one servant, not two, is in view.”27 In other words, an individual begins as a faithful and sensible slave, but then becomes an unfaithful, evil slave. According to such a view, the remote Greek demonstrative, ejkei'no", in verse 48 proves the same slave is in view. The slave started well, but did not finish well. Nevertheless, the slave was saved and is still saved even though he is unfaithful and will lose rewards.
The problem with this position (whether the slave is understood as only one servant that wavers in faith, or two slaves—one faithful and one unfaithful—that are saved) is that all of the parables in the Olivet Discourse contrast at least two individuals with the same social background. The use of slaves (24:46, 48, 50; 25:21, 23, 26, 30) is an effective means of illustrating the sovereignty of God over all humanity. Some will believe and some will not believe in Messiah, and the parables reveal the destiny of both.
26 Edersheim, Jesus the Messiah, 786, writes, “To the world this would indeed become the occasion for utter carelessness and practical disbelief of the coming judgment (vv. 37–40). As in the days of noah the long delay of threatened judgment had led to absorption in the ordinary engagements of life, to the entire disbelief of what Noah had preached, so would it be in the future. But that day would come certainly and unexpectedly, to the sudden separation of those who were engaged in the same daily business of life. . . .”
27 Joseph C. Dillow, The Reign of the Servant Kings (Hayesville, NC: Schoettle, 1992), 387.
9

The parable does not concern a slave who was faithful and later became unfaithful. The phrase, if that evil slave, does not refer to a hypothetical situation either. The point of the parable is the faithful and sensible slave will be rewarded when Messiah returns, in contrast to that evil slave whose Master shall cut him in pieces and assign him a place with the hypocrites (24:51). The evil character of the unbelieving slave is evident in his character which causes him to deceive himself into thinking the Messiah is not returning or that he will have time before Messiah returns to become ready.
The language cut him in pieces and weeping . . . and the gnashing of teeth has been interpreted as “Oriental symbolism for profound regret” and “the former is a metaphor for judgment.”28 BAGD defined bruvcw as “a sign of violent rage”29 which could indicate suffering and remorse. However, the noun brugmov" always indicates the eternity state of the wicked. Thayer defines bruvcw as “to grind, gnash, with the teeth” but defines brugmov" tw'n ojdovntwn in 24:51 as “a phrase denoting the extreme anguish and utter despair of men consigned to eternal condemnation.”30
The parable of the householder also deals with the subject of the judgment of Gentiles. Since God saves all Israel before the second coming, and these judgments occur at the second coming, they cannot be a reference to Israel. Indeed, Jesus will not return until the nation of Israel repents and acknowledges Him as Messiah (Lev 26:40–42; Jer 3:16–17; Hos 5:15–6:3; Zech 12–14; Matt 23:39). It is only when Israel cries out for the Messiah that He will return. They will look on Me whom they have pierced; and they will mourn for Him, as one mourns for an only son, and they will weep bitterly over Him (Zech 12:10). The judgments of Matthew 24:36–25:46 at the second coming would not pertain to Israel. Since the church has been raptured before this period, and the Olivet Discourse is dealing with tribulational events, then the judgments must be referring to the response of Gentiles in the tribulation to the Messiah before His return.
The Parable of the Ten Virgins (25:1-13)
Matthew 25 begins with the parable of the ten virgins. The background of the parable of the virgins is the Middle Eastern marriage custom. The marriage contract would come into being while the couple was quite young and unable to make adult decisions. Nevertheless, at this time, the couple was considered legally married. After an unspecified period passed and the couple had matured, the bridegroom would journey to the house of the bride, and take her to his home. The bride and groom would then proceed to the marriage supper, along with all the guests (cf. 22:1–14), at the house of the bridegroom. The wise virgins are those who were longing for the wedding feast at the house of the bridegroom. The marriage supper of the Lamb will take place on earth in the millennial kingdom (Rev 19:7–10).31
The marriage supper imagery is a familiar reference to a Jewish person concerning the Messianic kingdom and the bride, Israel. The context negates any
28 Ibid.
29 BAGD, 148.
30 Joseph Henry Thayer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament (1885; rev. ed., Grand
Rapids: Zondervan, n.d.), 106.
31 George N. H. Peters, The Theocratic Kingdom (New York: Funk & Wagnalls, 1884; reprint,
Grand Rapids: Kregel, 1952), 3:301. The wedding at Cana in Galilee (John 2:1–12) depicts the Jewish custom of marriage.
10

connection with the bhvma or the mystery . . . speaking with reference to Christ and the church. The Olivet Discourse does not even address the church or the issue of the rapture, the parable here is treating judgment at the second coming. The five foolish virgins were invited but not worthy (Matt 22:8) and will be sent into the outer darkness (22:13). One interpretation is to regard the man not dressed in wedding clothes is a saved man and “he was apparently not only in the kingdom but actually at the wedding banquet himself.”32 He is merely “outside the relative light of the banquet hall.”33
Such a view is based upon interpreting ejxwvtero" (8:12; 22:13; 25:30) as “the darkness outside.”34 Since the basic meaning of ejxwvtero" is “outside” it can be translated “the darkness outside.” However, the question is whether “outside” refers to exclusion from the millennial marriage feast or complete exclusion (due to lack of justification) from the millennial kingdom.
The superlative ejxwvtero" (“outer,” “exterior,” or “external”) is closely related to the adverb e[xw which is often translated “without” or “out of doors.” The adverb e[xw is used more than a few times (1 Cor 5:12-13; Col 4:5; 1 Thess 4:12; Rev 22:15) to describe the eternal destiny of the lost (“those who are without”).35 It is never used to describe the eternal destiny of the saved. Indeed, Jesus uses it, promising, “All that the Father gives Me shall come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will certainly not ejkbavlw e[xw (John 6:37).
Some contend that the man in Matthew 22:13 is saved and therefore allowed into the wedding hall, but excluded from the marriage feast. If this interpretation is accepted, then consistency must be maintained in 25:10 and the foolish virgins are saved.36 Matthew, however, said the door was shut hence they were not allowed into the wedding hall. Furthermore, Jesus answered and said, “Truly I say to you, I do not know you” (25:12; cf. 7:21-23). Once the door was shut it was too late to enter, therefore, “Be on the alert then, for you do not know the day nor the hour (25:13). Those who are outside do not just miss an extravagant meal; they are completely outside the kingdom permanently.
Since the parable begins with the phrase, oJmoiwqhvsetai hJ basileiva tw'n oujranw'n (25:1), it is not addressing “eternal reward” but “eternal salvation.” Matthew used the phrase thirty-two times (3:2; 4:17; 5:3, 10, 19, 20; 7:21; 8:11; 10:9; 11:11, 12; 13:11, 24, 31, 33, 44, 45, 47, 52; 16:19; 18:1, 3, 4, 23; 19:12, 14, 23; 20:1; 22:2; 23:13; 25:1, 14) and when he used it in other parables outside the Olivet Discourse, they are always treating the issue of eternal salvation.
32 Dillow, Servant Kings, 347.
33 Ibid., 348.
34 Ibid.
35 William D. Mounce, The Analytical Lexicon to the Greek New Testament (Grand Rapids:
Zondervan, 1993), 197.
36 Dillow recognizes this difficulty in Servant Kings, 396.

Friday, August 26, 2016

ARE WE LIVING IN THE LAST DAYS?


ARE WE LIVING IN THE LAST DAYS?
Tom's Perspectives by Thomas Ice
An important question that many Christians often ask is “Are we living in the last days or end times?” When people ask me this question, I usually respond with a clear “Yes and No!” Such an answer requires an explanation. My explanation is that the Bible uses such terminology in multiple ways, so that some references do refer to our own day, while others do not.
LAST DAYS VOCABULARY
Sometimes Christians read in the Bible about the “last days,” “end times,” etc., and tend to think that all of these phrases all of the time refer to the same thing. This is not the case, just as in our own lives there are many endings: there is the end of the work day, the end of the day according to the clock, the end of the week, the end of the month, and the end of the year. Just because the word “end” is used does not mean that it always refers to the same time. The word “end” is restricted and precisely defined when it is modified by “day,” “week,” “year,” etc. So it is in the Bible that “end times” may refer to the end of the current church age or it may refer to other times.
There are a number of different biblical expressions which appear to speak of the end times. The Bible teaches that this present age will end with the rapture, followed by the tribulation, which will end with the second coming of Messiah to the earth. Thus, we must distinguish between the “last days” of the church age and the “last days” of Israel’s tribulation.
Note the following chart, which classifies and distinguishes between passages referring to the end of the church age and the “last days” for Israel:
BIBLICAL USE OF LAST DAYS ISRAEL
CHURCH
“latter days”— Deuteronomy 4:30; 31:29; Jeremiah 30:24; 48:47; Daniel 2:28; 10:14
“last days”—
Isaiah 2:2; Jeremiah 23:20; 49:39; Ezekiel 38:16; Hosea 3:4–5; Micah 4:1; Acts 2:17
“last day”—
John 6:39, 40, 44, 54; 11:24; 12:48
“latter years”— Ezekiel 38:8
“end of time”— Daniel 8:17; 12:4, 9
“end of the age”— Daniel 12:13
“latter days”— 1 Timothy 4:1
“last days”—
2 Timothy 3:1; Hebrews 1:2; James 5:3; 2 Peter 3:3
“last times”—
1 Peter 1:20; Jude 18
“last time”—
1 Peter 1:5; 1 John 2:18
The Bible clearly speaks of a last days or end time, but it does not always refer to the same period of time. The contextual referent enables the reader to know whether the Bible is speaking of the last days relating to Israel or the end times in reference to the church.
Many believe that there are specific signs that relate to the end of the church age. However, I believe that it would be too strong to say that there are signs of the end of the church age. Instead, the Bible indicates what the condition of the church will be like—the general course of the age—and then warns about some general trends toward the later part of the church age. Passages like 1 Timothy 4:1–5, 2 Timothy 3:1–5, and 2 Peter 3:3 most likely refer to the second half or latter part of the church age. These passages warn believers about beliefs and lifestyles that are common in the world will enter the church and become common there as well. These passages do not speak about the general moral decline of society, which I do not doubt, instead, it is a decline that was predicted to occur within the church as part of the apostasy.
It can also be noted, that it is hard to quantify such decline. No matter how bad things get, they can always get a little worse. So it is impossible to know specifically how bad things must be in order for something to be a prophetic sign. It is the general
www.pre-trib.org 2
condition within the realm of the church in which “evil men and impostors will proceed from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived” (2 Tim. 3:13).
THE CHURCH AGE
There are a number of New Testament passages where “last days,” “last times,” and “last time” clearly refer to the present church age in which we now live. The writer of Hebrews says, “God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways, in these last days has spoken to us in His Son” (Heb. 1:1–2). The contextual nuance of this passage demands that “last days” is a reference to the current church age in which we presently live. In the same way Peter says, “For He was foreknown before the foundation of the world, but has appeared in these last times for the sake of you” (1 Pet. 1:20). These “last times,” to which he speaks, in that context, must refer to the last two thousand years in which we still live. John adds support to the two previous writers when he says, “Children, it is the last hour; and just as you heard that antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have arisen; from this we know that it is the last hour” (1 John 2:18). Jude, speaking of things going on in his day says, “that they were saying to you, “In the last time there shall be mockers, following after their own ungodly lusts” (Jude 18).
The Jewish view of Bible prophecy viewed history as consisting of two ages. The first was this present age, the age in which Israel was waiting for the coming of the Messiah. The second was the age to come, the age in which all promises and covenants would be fulfilled and Israel would enter into her promised blessings as a result of Messiah’s coming. The present age would be terminated by the appearance of Messiah, and the coming age would be introduced by His advent. The present age, then, was to end in judgment, and the coming age must be preceded by this devastation. The New Testament references the present age as the last days. The last days of what? The last days before the coming of the Messianic age.
We see that there are at least four clear references in the New Testament that use end times vocabulary to refer to their own day and the entire church age as the last days. Thus, in that sense, we are clearly living in the last days, since the entire church age is considered the last days. However, that is not what the average person means when they ask, “Are we living in the last days?” They want to know if we are living in a time when the final prophecies of Scripture are being fulfilled. Before I can answer that, we need to look into the use of Old Testament terminology and the last days.
OLD TESTAMENT USE OF LAST DAYS
When we look at Old Testament usage of these terms, we see that they are used differently than those which speak of the church age. I believe that the Old Testament use of this language refers to the time leading up to the coming of Messiah to set up His kingdom on earth, which I would call the tribulation period.
A clear example of this is found in Deuteronomy 4:30, which says, “When you are in distress and all these things have come upon you, in the latter days, you will return to the LORD your God and listen to His voice.” The English word “distress” is the Hebrew word for tribulation—in this context, the tribulation—which means that this text equates
www.pre-trib.org 3
the tribulation with the “latter days.” Thus, the “latter days” are the tribulation period, which we are not currently living in, but may be on the brink of entering. Of course, the church will be raptured before the world enters the tribulation. Deuteronomy 31:29 uses “latter days” as a reference to the tribulation when it says, “evil will befall you in the latter days.”
The term “latter days” is used of the tribulation period twice in Jeremiah (30:24; 48:47). Daniel also uses it this way: “However, there is a God in heaven who reveals mysteries, and He has made known to King Nebuchadnezzar what will take place in the latter days” (Dan. 2:28). Daniel commences to reveal God’s plan for the future, which revolves around events that will unfold in the tribulation period. This is also the case concerning another passage in Daniel: “Now I have come to give you an understanding of what will happen to your people in the latter days, for the vision pertains to the days yet future” (Dan. 10:14).
The prophet Daniel uses a whole cluster of other “latter day” terms that all refer to the tribulation period or prepare the way for the kingdom reign of Messiah. Terms like “end of time” (Dan. 8:17; 12:4, 9) and “end of the age” (Dan. 12:13) speak of the end- time, tribulation period, which is yet to come. These terms are used three times in Daniel 12, which is said in verse one of that chapter to “be a time of distress such as never occurred since there was a nation until that time.” “Distress” is the Hebrew word for tribulation. Thus, the entire context is once again a reference to the coming tribulation.
Daniel 12:4, says the teachings about the end-times in Daniel will be sealed up for the Jewish people until “the end of time.” Many prophecy teachers believe that shortly before Christ’s return the world would experience an increase in the speed of travel coupled with an explosion of information based upon Daniel 12:4, which says “many will go back and forth, and knowledge will increase.” No one would quarrel with the fact that the last one hundred years has indeed witnessed an exponential increase in both the speed of travel and the accumulation of knowledge and thus would be a sign in our time that the end is near. But is this really what Daniel is saying in the passage? I don’t think so.
The correct interpretation of the passage is given by Dr. Charles Ryrie in his famous Ryrie Study Bible when he says, “As the end approaches, people will travel about seeking to discover what the future holds.”1 Not just people in general, but the Jewish people in particular. This means that many Jews during the tribulation will study the Book of Daniel in an attempt to find out what is going on during this unique period of time. Harry Bultema says, “The movement of to and fro may refer to that of the eyes through leaves. . . . Thus considered it seems to us that the text here speaks of the diligent search of the Scripture at the end of time.”2 Thus, the scope would be limited to the future time of the tribulation and could not justly be applied to our own day.
There does not appear to be any real textual basis for the first interpretation. The meaning of the Hebrew words and grammar do not support such a view.
www.pre-trib.org 4
CONCLUSION
So are we living in the last days? As you can tell from the above discussion, we are currently living in the last days because we are in the church age, which is called the “last days,” “last times,” and “last time.” However, in no way shape or form are we in the last days, as the Old Testament says of Israel. Those terms, “latter days,” “last days,” “latter years,” “end of time,” and “end of the age” all refer a time when Israel is in her time of tribulation. This is a future time, which we could very well be on the verge of entering. I believe that we are seeing the stage being set for last days or end time events of the tribulation. But we are not currently in those times at the present time. Maranatha!

Thursday, August 25, 2016

Signs of Spiritual Decay


Signs of Spiritual Decay


But while all this was going on, I was not in Jerusalem, for in the thirty-second year of Artaxerxes king of Babylon I had returned to the king. Some time later I asked his permission and came back to Jerusalem. Here I learned about the evil thing Eliashib had done in providing Tobiah a room in the courts of the house of God. I was greatly displeased and threw all Tobiah’s household goods out of the room. I gave orders to purify the rooms, and then I put back into them the equipment of the house of God, with the grain offerings and the incense…
Nehemiah 13:4-31
What are signs of spiritual decay in our lives or others and how should we confront it?

After seeing the revival that happened in Israel, we also see how prone they were to fall back into sin and compromise. Some have compared the spiritual life to walking upstream; if you are not fighting to move forward, then you are, by default, going backwards.

At this point in the final chapter of Nehemiah, Nehemiah returned to Persia for some unspecified amount of time.1 Some commentators think his second term as governor began approximately nine years after he left.2 While Nehemiah was gone, it is possible that Ezra had died “(in 13:13, Zadok is called “the” scribe, perhaps indicating that Ezra no longer held that post).”3 When Nehemiah returned, Israel had reneged on the majority of its commitments to God, which they made in chapter 10.

This may seem like a surprise after all God had done for them and their seemingly genuine repentance; however, this not only happened with Israel, it commonly happens to us individually and corporately. If we are not fighting to move forward, then we are sliding backwards. It is for this reason that we must be tenacious in seeking to practice a holy life and also fighting for holiness in our churches. There is a continual inertia drawing us and others towards spiritual decay.

Certainly, we see this in our churches and Christian communities. Why are so many of our churches in disarray? Statistics say that around 75% of youth fall away from the faith in college and never return.4 Seventeen hundred pastors leave the ministry every month in America.5 We have churches making all kinds of moral compromises as they disregard Scripture. We are seeing a very rapid spiritual decay happening in the church.

As we consider Nehemiah 13, it can seem a little depressing after such a great revival. And, it also can be depressing as we consider the decline of Christianity happening in so many parts of the world; however, there is hope. We see hope in a man who was zealous for the Lord named Nehemiah.

Four times he prays for God to remember his works in this chapter. He is a man who wants to please God. Yes, there is hope for us individually and as a church as well. God still uses people like Nehemiah, people like John the Baptist, godly leaders who are zealous to turn communities and individuals back to God.

In this text, Nehemiah is a type of Christ. As Christ went into the temple, he pulled out a whip, turned over tables, and harshly rebuked the leaders of Israel. Scripture says of Christ that zeal for the house of God consumed him (John 2:17). Nehemiah was the same. He threw a man out of the temple who was defiling it, rebuked the leaders for their lack of faithfulness in giving, locked people out of the city who were abusing the Sabbath, and pulled out the hairs of those who married foreign women in order to turn them back to God. Nehemiah was a man consumed with seeing God’s glory in Israel.

In the same way, God is calling for people in this generation to be zealous for personal holiness and also holiness in the church. He is looking to raise people who are consumed with zeal for the house of God (cf. 2 Chronicles 16:9).

In this text, we will consider common signs of spiritual decay not only in the church but in our spiritual lives. Godly leaders must be able to spiritually diagnose their people, their society, and even their own lives. They must be able to diagnose so they can participate in the restoration process. In this text, we will not only see common signs of spiritual decay but also steps to restoration—to restore our churches and our lives.

Big Question: What signs of spiritual decay do we see happening to Israel in Nehemiah 13; how does Nehemiah confront them, and how should we apply these truths as leaders to our spiritual lives and our ministries?

Compromised Leadership Is a Sign of Spiritual Decay

Before this, Eliashib the priest had been put in charge of the storerooms of the house of our God. He was closely associated with Tobiah, and he had provided him with a large room formerly used to store the grain offerings and incense and temple articles, and also the tithes of grain, new wine and oil prescribed for the Levites, singers and gatekeepers, as well as the contributions for the priests.
Nehemiah 13:4-5
In this text, Nehemiah introduces us to the compromise that was happening within Israel. They broke all the commitments they made in chapter 10. It is no surprise that when he started to list their sins, he started with the leadership of Israel. The High Priest was disrespecting God by allowing an Ammonite official into the temple (cf. Neh 2:10, 13:1). He had given Tobiah, who had previously persecuted the Jews, a room in God’s house.

This is how moral compromise often begins in the people of God—it begins with the leadership. The leadership starts to compromise by disobedience and disregard for the teachings of the Word of God, which eventually affects all the people. Have we not seen the effects of bad leadership throughout Scripture?

Interpretation Question: In what ways have we seen the negative effects of bad leadership throughout Scripture?

Solomon compromised by marrying pagan women in disobedience to the law, and consequently, all of Israel was led astray into worshiping idols. The book of Kings shows us a pattern of Israel’s stumbles. They would have a good king and, therefore, start following God. And then they would have a bad king and, consequently, stumble away from him. For every Josiah, Asa and Jehoshophat, there was a Jereboam, Jehu, and Ahab, the wicked kings of Israel who led the nation astray.

During this time period, not only were the kings corrupt but so were the priests. In fact, right before God judged Israel by Assyria, God rebuked the priests through the prophet Hosea.6 Listen to what he said:

The more the priests increased, the more they sinned against me; they exchanged their Glory for something disgraceful. They feed on the sins of my people and relish their wickedness. And it will be: Like people, like priests. I will punish both of them for their ways and repay them for their deeds.
Hosea 4:7-9
The priests were sinning just like the people. In fact, they enjoyed the sins of the people and made a profit off of them. God promised he would punish the priests and the people together for their compromise.

Theological and moral compromises amongst the leadership of churches or ministries typically precede people going astray. In fact, when Christ appeared in the Gospels, Israel was being run by the Pharisees and Sadducees who were corrupting the teachings of Scripture and leading people astray as well. In the Gospels, Christ spent a significant amount of time correcting and rebuking the leadership of the people.

Application Question: Why is the leadership of the church so important?

Consider what Christ said: “A student is not above his teacher, nor a servant above his master. It is enough for the student to be like his teacher, and the servant like his master” (Matthew 10:24-25). The people can go no farther than their leaders. The leaders create the ceiling for the church.

When we look at the state of our churches, it is often a reflection of its leaders. When we have leadership that does not preach the Word, leadership that is not on fire for God, leadership that does not run their household well, it is no surprise that the light in the church is so dim.

Paul described the church in the last days in a similar manner. He said that the church would not be able to stand sound doctrine and, therefore, would heap up many teachers to itch their ears and to say what they wanted to hear (2 Tim 4:3-4).

Interpretation Question: Why was the High Priest compromising? What could be some of the reasons?

We are not sure why the High Priest compromised; it could be many reasons:

1. Maybe, he had liberal doctrine.

Even though they had just read that Moabites and Ammonites could not enter the temple (cf. Neh 13:1), maybe he thought the Scripture was antiquated, full of errors, and not relevant. Maybe he thought God was not the author of “every” portion of Scripture, and therefore he could pick and choose what was of God. We see that happening in many churches today, and consequently, instead of submitting to the Word of God, they stand in judgment over it. They take liberty to decide what God said and did not say. They say, “God didn’t really create the earth as seen in Genesis; it was created through the evolutionary process.” “Jonah wasn’t really swallowed by a whale.” “Jesus didn’t really turn water into wine.” They choose what is of God and not of God, and therefore, they choose what not to submit to.

Eliashib might have rebelled because of his doctrine which, no doubt, would have also negatively affected the people.

2. Maybe, he was a people pleaser—meaning he wanted the applause of the people instead of God.

Potentially, it was the Israelites clamoring for more liberality and for him to stop being so narrow-minded. Later in this chapter, we see that many of the people married foreigners and their children couldn’t speak Hebrew (v. 23-24). Maybe he wouldn’t stand up for God.

As mentioned previously, Paul declared that this would happen in the last days. People would heap up many teachers that would itch their ears and make them feel good. Many ministers won’t preach strong doctrine or hold the church accountable for fear of losing their jobs, status, or numbers in the church. Today, we have many leaders in the church who are “men of men” instead of “men of God.”

3. Maybe, he was simply a hypocrite.

He might have been preaching the truth but not practicing it in the temple. In that case, he would have been a hypocritical leader.

Whatever the reason, we can be sure that his actions contributed to the sins of the people. As we look at the rest of the text, we see that the people are living in great compromise as well. Like priest, like people; we see this happening all around us, and therefore, decay has crept into many of our churches.

Leaders of the church must ask themselves, “Are we setting the example?” (1 Peter 5:3). It is the leaders who set the spiritual ceiling for the congregation. It is enough for a student to be like his teacher. If the pastor, elders, and teachers are no longer growing in zeal for Christ, how can they expect it from the congregation? If the leadership in the church is no longer growing in the knowledge of Scripture, how can they expect it from the congregation? The leadership sets both the ceiling and the direction of the congregation.

Let this challenge us as we serve in any form of leadership to never be lacking in zeal or obedience and to always be abounding in the work of the Lord (cf. 1 Cor 15:58). But also let this challenge us to pray daily for the leadership of our local church and churches around the world. It is enough for a disciple to be like his teacher.

Application Question: In what ways have you seen both the positive and negative effects of leadership in the church? How can the church better support our leaders in order to encourage their continual growth in the Lord?

Misuse of Finances Is a Sign of Spiritual Decay

I also learned that the portions assigned to the Levites had not been given to them, and that all the Levites and singers responsible for the service had gone back to their own fields.
Nehemiah 13:10
Nehemiah 13:10 says the Israelites stopped supporting the Levites who maintained the temple and taught the people. Because they were not being supported they moved back to their fields to earn a living. Listen to what Nehemiah said: “I also learned that the portions assigned to the Levites had not been given to them, and that all the Levites and singers responsible for the service had gone back to their own fields.”

Most commentators say that Malachi was prophesying during this period of time.7 God said through the prophet in Malachi 3:8 that the people had robbed God through their tithes and offerings. They had stopped giving to God.

Similarly, this is a common sign of spiritual decay with us. Whatever we really love, we put our money into. If we really love books, movies, food, or anything else, one can tell by looking at our bank statements.

In the same way, when God is no longer our priority, we will find it harder to support his work with our finances. This is what was happening with Israel. God had ceased to be their priority, and therefore, they stopped giving to his work. Similarly, when they were on fire for God, their offerings were great. Remember the giving in the previous chapter:

And on that day they offered great sacrifices, rejoicing because God had given them great joy. The women and children also rejoiced. The sound of rejoicing in Jerusalem could be heard far away. At that time men were appointed to be in charge of the storerooms for the contributions, firstfruits and tithes. From the fields around the towns they were to bring into the storerooms the portions required by the Law for the priests and the Levites, for Judah was pleased with the ministering priests and Levites.
Nehemiah 12:43-44
When they were on fire for God, they gave great sacrifices with joy. Similarly, when we are on fire for God, we also give joyfully, but when our relationship with God cools, we start to give less or the giving ceases all together.

I have seen this personally in my own life. I remember being in college on a full basketball scholarship, without any real financial needs. I was growing in God—knowing his voice more and enjoying his presence. With that came a growing desire to give to him, simply because I loved him. But the problem was I didn’t make any money. My scholarship provided all my needs, but it didn’t provide any spending money. So, I remember getting a part-time job just because I wanted to have something to give, not only to God but also to others who had needs. This is a natural occurrence. When you are growing in love with someone, you naturally want to give, not only financially, but you want to share in all good things with that person.

I experienced this with my daughter, especially when she was a baby. I remember going to the store to buy groceries, and without a real need, I went straight to the baby section. I was thinking, “What can I buy for my daughter?” There was great joy in buying things for her. I got new diapers and a special no-throw-up formula. I got some scented baby bath liquid that would help put her to sleep (which my wife swiftly threw away, saying something about “chemicals”). I bought a bunch of stuff that at that stage of life meant nothing to my daughter, and she couldn’t even thank me for them. However, giving to her helped fulfill my joy. It’s a natural thing to give when you really love someone and that includes giving to God.

Jesus said this about our treasures—our finances: “For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also” (Matthew 6:21). He taught that wherever one puts his money, it will show where his heart really is.

In fact, what a person spends his money on is often an indicator of his spiritual health—including his salvation. Let’s look at John the Baptist when he called Israel to bear fruits worthy of repentance or to prove their salvation (cf. Lk 3:8). He said:

“What should we do then?” the crowd asked. John answered, “The man with two tunics should share with him who has none, and the one who has food should do the same.” Tax collectors also came to be baptized. “Teacher,” they asked, “what should we do?” ”Don’t collect any more than you are required to,” he told them. Then some soldiers asked him, “And what should we do?” He replied, “Don’t extort money and don’t accuse people falsely—be content with your pay.”
Luke 3:10-14
To the wealthy who had two tunics (or jackets), he said, “Share.” To the tax collectors, he said, “Don’t collect more money than is required.” To the soldiers, he said, “Don’t extort money and be content with your pay.”

Isn’t that interesting? Every fruit that had to do with true repentance, which really means true salvation, was shown in their finances. How people handle their money shows whether they truly love God. It shows where their relationship with God is.

What does the way you use your finances say about your relationship with God? The decay in Israel’s spiritual life was shown in their lack of giving to the Lord.

Consider what Paul teaches about our giving in 2 Corinthians 8:7: “But just as you excel in everything—in faith, in speech, in knowledge, in complete earnestness and in your love for us—see that you also excel in this grace of giving.”

He says as believers, we should seek to grow in our giving to the Lord. It should be abounding. This makes perfect sense because giving is an indicator of our love for God. Since our love for God should always be growing, by necessity, so should our giving. Therefore, when our desire to give is less, it is a sign of spiritual decay. That’s what happened with Israel and that’s what happens with us.

What does your giving say about your heart? How is God calling you to excel in giving?

Application Question: What do you spend most of your money on? What does that say about your heart?

A Decrease in Time Given to Worship Is a Sign of Spiritual Decay

In Nehemiah 13:15-16, we also see that the people stopped practicing the Sabbath. Look at what it says:

In those days I saw men in Judah treading winepresses on the Sabbath and bringing in grain and loading it on donkeys, together with wine, grapes, figs and all other kinds of loads. And they were bringing all this into Jerusalem on the Sabbath. Men from Tyre who lived in Jerusalem were bringing in fish and all kinds of merchandise and selling them in Jerusalem on the Sabbath to the people of Judah.

The Sabbath originally was meant to be a time of rest, where the Israelites focused on God instead of work or other things. However, at this point, many people no longer practiced the Sabbath but instead compromised with the world, as they bought and sold on the Sabbath day. Instead of focusing on God and worshiping him, they focused on their work and making money instead.

No doubt, Israel had excuses. If everybody was working and they closed their businesses, they would lose money and customers. They could rationalize it.

It’s the same for us. It’s easy to rationalize missing church, small group, or our personal Bible study, but that doesn’t make it right. “I’ve got school.” “I’ve got work.” “If I don’t work, how am I going to pay my bills? I can’t commit to church or small group.” “I got home from work late; I can’t go to church tomorrow.” We have all types of excuses that keep us from worshiping, keep us from reading our Bible or serving the church. This was a sign of spiritual decay with Israel, and it’s the same for us.

I don’t believe we are under the Sabbath as a law because Christ is our Sabbath (cf. Col 2:16-17), but the principle is the same. Typically, when there is moral decline in our life, we will find that there has also been a decline in our time given to worshipping God.

The signals of this are hard to miss. Some people may stop going to church all together and others become sporadic. They stop going to small group and start missing their daily quiet times. Many never commit to any type of consistent worship. These are all signs of spiritual decay. You must be fighting to grow or your relationship with God and your holiness will decline. Paul said, “Exercise yourself to godliness” (1 Timothy 4:7). Without disciplining ourselves to worship, we cannot be godly people.

How is your daily and weekly commitment to worship? What does it say about your relationship with God?

It should also be noted that what we give our time to in lieu of worship shows our idolatry. The Israelites were making wealth an idol over God. They would shop, buy, and sell on the Sabbath instead of worshiping the Lord. Materialism had become their idol.

What is keeping you out of worship? Is it work? Is it friends? Is it rest? What is keeping you from finding your Sabbath in Christ? Whatever you do instead of worshiping the Lord or spending time with him shows the idols in your heart.

Application Question: What are common things that cause you to neglect the worship of God? How is God calling you to put him first?

Worldly Relationships Are a Sign of Spiritual Decay

In Nehemiah 13:23-24, we see that the Israelites also compromised by marrying pagan women. Nehemiah said this:

Moreover, in those days I saw men of Judah who had married women from Ashdod, Ammon and Moab. Half of their children spoke the language of Ashdod or the language of one of the other peoples, and did not know how to speak the language of Judah.
Nehemiah 13:23-24
This compromise was so bad that many of the children couldn’t even speak Hebrew, which meant they couldn’t read the Holy Scriptures or understand the teaching of the priests and Levites.

When we compromise with the world, not only does it affect us, but it affects those close to us, like our children. They will grow up speaking and thinking like the world, instead of speaking and thinking like God.

God gave strict rules against marrying foreigners in the Old Testament because of the tendency of being drawn to worship other gods. Solomon compromised in this area and, essentially, turned the nation of Israel away from God, eventually leading to their exile. This dangerous compromise had previously almost destroyed Israel. The marrying of a foreigner itself probably wasn’t sin, for Ruth and Rahab were both foreigners. However, they had committed to worshiping Yahweh and were, eventually, placed in the lineage of Christ.

In the New Testament, we similarly have clear admonitions and prohibitions against marrying an unbeliever. Look at what Paul says to the widows in 1 Corinthians 7:39: “A woman is bound to her husband as long as he lives. But if her husband dies, she is free to marry anyone she wishes, but he must belong to the Lord.”

A widow was free to marry anyone, but the person had to belong to the Lord. It had to be someone who was serving God. Similarly, Paul declared how he had the right to take a “believing wife,” which implies he didn’t have a right to take one who didn’t believe. Look at what he said in 1 Corinthians 9:5: “Don’t we have the right to take a believing wife along with us, as do the other apostles and the Lord’s brothers and Cephas?”

However, this call to separation does not just apply to marriage but to all intimate relationships with the world. Second Corinthians 6:14 says this: “Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness?”

Paul used an analogy from the Old Testament law about not yoking two different animals together, such as an ox and a donkey in Deuteronomy 22:10. Many believe this work-related law had to do with their inability to plow a straight line. The ox and donkey have different natures and different temperaments. The ox is so strong it would pull the donkey in a different direction, and therefore, the work would be unproductive.

In the same way, Christians are not to be in any worldly relationships that keep them from walking a straight line with Christ—that pull them away from God and hinder them from being productive in serving him. Certainly, this applies to marriage, but it also applies to friendship, work, and everything else.

One seminary professor said where a person will be in ten years will mostly be affected by the books they read and the company they kept.8 What do your most intimate relationships say about your relationship with God and your future? Solomon said something similar. Proverbs 13:20 says, “He who walks with the wise grows wise, but a companion of fools suffers harm.”

Now, certainly we are called to minister to the world and to love them, but we are not called to be “yoked with them.” Christ ate and drank with the world in hopes of winning them to God. He befriended them, prayed for them, and served them, but, when you look at his most intimate relationships, it shows that his most intimate relationships were with believers.

It has often been said that Christ had five rings of fellowship around him. He had the three apostles: Peter, James and John—his most intimate friends. He took them up on the Mount of Transfiguration when he didn’t take others. He took them to pray before his death. Then Christ had the nine other apostles who were always with him. He had the seventy-two (cf. Lk 10:1). And he had other followers outside of that, and then he had the world.

His most intimate relationships were not with those going a different direction. He was a friend of sinners, but his deepest friendships were with those who were following God. Christ said this: “Who are my mother, brother, and sister but those who obey God?” (Matt 12:50, paraphrase). You are affected by your most intimate relationships. Amos said this: “Can two walk together unless they are agreed?” (Amos 3:3).

Your most intimate relationships not only affect your ministry, but they also reflect who you are. They reflect what is inside you and what you agree with.

What do your most intimate relationships say about your relationship with God? Are your closest relationships with those who will pull you closer to the Lord or farther away from him? Friendship with the world is a sign of spiritual decay (cf. James 4:4).

Application Question: What is the balance of being salt and light in the world and also being separate from the world? Do you have any relationships that commonly pull you away from God? How is God calling you to remedy that?

How to Fix Spiritual Decay

We just looked at signs of spiritual decay in the life of a community or an individual believer. We can discern spiritual decay by looking at our leaders, our use of finances, our time given to worship, and our relationships.

What should we do if we see areas of decay in our life or in the church? How can we fix it? What can we learn from Nehemiah who is a type of Christ, as he zealously sought to turn the nation back to God?

Application Question: How can we fix spiritual decay, as demonstrated through Nehemiah?

1. We must become aware of areas of sin.

In this chapter, we commonly see how Nehemiah saw or was informed about the sins happening in Israel. Look at the passages below:

And came back to Jerusalem. Here I learned about the evil thing Eliashib had done in providing Tobiah a room in the courts of the house of God.
Nehemiah 13:7
I also learned that the portions assigned to the Levites had not been given to them, and that all the Levites and singers responsible for the service had gone back to their own fields.
Nehemiah 13:10
Moreover, in those days I saw men of Judah who had married women from Ashdod, Ammon and Moab.
Nehemiah 13:23
Similarly, if we are going to fix areas of compromise in our lives or others, we must be aware of it. This is the first step. The problem with many individuals and communities is the fact that they don’t even know they have a problem. They are unaware of the idolatry in their hearts. They are unaware of their sin or don’t think the sin in their lives or their community is a big problem. Therefore, they don’t seek to remedy it.

Application Question: What are ways that we can better discern areas of sin or compromise in ourselves and others?

We must be people of the Word of God.
This is implied in verses 1-3. The Israelites were reading the Scripture on the day they dedicated the wall (cf. Nehemiah 12), and they learned they were forbidden to allow Moabites and Ammonites to enter the temple, leading them to repent. Look at what it says:

On that day the Book of Moses was read aloud in the hearing of the people and there it was found written that no Ammonite or Moabite should ever be admitted into the assembly of God, because they had not met the Israelites with food and water but had hired Balaam to call a curse down on them. (Our God, however, turned the curse into a blessing.) When the people heard this law, they excluded from Israel all who were of foreign descent.
Nehemiah 13:1-3
In the same way, we must constantly be in the Word if we are going to recognize sin. It is like a mirror that reveals our sin and compromise (cf. James 1:22-25) and the sin of others.

We must have accountability relationships where people have the right to speak into our lives.
This is what we see with Nehemiah. Nehemiah came back to Israel and pointed out all the wrong things being committed within her. David had Nathan. Nathan, as a prophet, would confront David when he was in sin, no matter how uncomfortable it must have felt. Similarly, we should have people that we allow and invite to be prophetic in our life.

These accountability relationships include sometimes asking questions like: “How is your spiritual life going?” “How is your marriage going?” “How is your time in the Word of God?” If we are going to be part of the solution, we must be aware of the problem.

Who is your Nehemiah? Who has the right to speak into your life?

We should pray for God to point sin out in our lives and our communities.
Listen to how David prayed: “Search me, O God, and know my heart; test me and know my anxious thoughts. See if there is any offensive way in me, and lead me in the way everlasting” (Psalm 139:23-24).

David sought for God to reveal things in his life that were not right. We must continually bring ourselves before God as well and ask him to show us areas of compromise so we can become more like him.

We must spend time with the people we lead and get to know them in order to discern how we can help them.
The good shepherd knows his sheep by name (John 10:3, 14). We must spend time with them. We must be with them in times of celebration, in times of mourning, and in everyday activities. We must know them. As we know them, we will better discern areas of compromise in their lives and how to minister to those areas.

What else should we do to help fix spiritual decay in our lives and others’?

2. We must develop a righteous anger that leads us to confront sin.

Nehemiah 13:8 says, “I was greatly displeased and threw all Tobiah’s household goods out of the room.”

Nehemiah became very displeased when he heard about Tobiah being in the temple. However, not only was he displeased, he went into the apartment, threw everything outside, and then filled it with the offerings and the other things of God.

His anger also led him to confront many of the other people. Consider these texts:

So I rebuked the officials and asked them, “Why is the house of God neglected?” Then I called them together and stationed them at their posts.
Nehemiah 13:11
I rebuked the nobles of Judah and said to them, “What is this wicked thing you are doing—desecrating the Sabbath day?”
Nehemiah 13:17
I rebuked them and called curses down on them. I beat some of the men and pulled out their hair.
Nehemiah 13:25
One of the sons of Joiada son of Eliashib the high priest was son-in-law to Sanballat the Horonite. And I drove him away from me.
Nehemiah 13:28
Not only did his anger lead to rebuking the people, but also to beating the men who had compromised by marrying the pagan women. He beat them and pulled out their hair (v. 25). When he said that he pulled out their hair, he was probably referring to the hair on their beards. By pulling out the hair on their beards, he was probably disrespecting their Jewishness. Jews were called to be holy, and one of the ways they represented that was by the males growing beards. Essentially, he was saying, “You are not following God! You are not a Jew!”

Another outlet of his righteous anger was running the High Priest’s son away from the temple for also marrying a pagan (v. 28). This man had defiled the priesthood. God gave specific commandments for a priest’s wife. She had to be a Jew and a virgin (Leviticus 21). Therefore, the High Priest’s son was disobeying God and consequently leading others to do the same.

Now many of us struggle with what Nehemiah did, and it may even seem unkind. However, this is exactly how Scripture calls us to handle sin, especially our own. Listen to what Jesus said:

If your right eye causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell. And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell.
Matthew 5:29-30
Christ said you must be drastic in trying to get rid of sin in your life. If you struggle with lust, get rid of whatever is leading you into sin. Get rid of the TV; turn off your Internet connection. If it’s a friendship or a relationship leading you into sin, be willing to separate yourself from it. John Owen said, “Be killing sin or it will be killing you.” We must be drastic in seeking to get rid of sin in our lives.

But this is not just for individuals, it is also needed in the church when there is unrepentant sin. Look at what Paul said to the Corinthians:

hand this man over to Satan, so that the sinful nature may be destroyed and his spirit saved on the day of the Lord. Your boasting is not good. Don’t you know that a little yeast works through the whole batch of dough?
1 Corinthians 5:5-6
In this context, a believer was having sex with his father’s wife. Paul told them to kick this person out of the church (hand over to Satan) because the yeast of this person’s sin would spread. It would spread like a deadly cancer. Paul commanded them to not even eat with a professing believer who was living in unrepentant sin (1 Cor 5:11).

In the same way that it is not cruel or unloving for a doctor to cut cancer out of a patient to save his life, it is not cruel or unloving for the church to do the same with sin. We must lovingly help our friends get rid of habitual sins. At times, we must even separate ourselves from those who will not repent. Although this may be hard, we must do this in order to become holy and to help others become holy.

Because the church does not often practice this, it has become more and more compromising and less effective for the kingdom of God.

Yes, we must be wise as serpents and gentle as doves (Matt 10:16). There is a place for tact, but I think the church has too much wisdom and too much tact, which often means that we do nothing. There is a place for this in the wise plan of God. It is those who are righteously angry who do something about abortion. It is those who are righteously angry who do something about trafficking. It is those who are righteously angry who say this is not right and who fight for justice. It is the righteously angry who mourn, weep, and pray for the God of heaven to move on our behalf. We need to be forceful men and women who advance the kingdom of God (Matthew 11:12).

3. We must be people who truly desire to please God.

Nehemiah 13:14 says, “Remember me for this, O my God, and do not blot out what I have so faithfully done for the house of my God and its services.”

Four times Nehemiah prays that God would remember him. This reflects the reason that Nehemiah was so zealous. It was because he truly wanted God’s approval and favor over his life. When one is living for the world’s approval instead of God’s, it will be easy to compromise and not respond to sin.

We must be people who truly desire to see God pleased with our lives. The fact that this is repeated four times demonstrates how great of a priority this was for Nehemiah, and it must be for us as well.

4. We must be people with perseverance.

Another thing clearly demonstrated in this text is Nehemiah’s great perseverance. He had already challenged Israel about all these things in the previous chapters. He had already helped them get rid of the compromise with foreigners. He had helped restore the Sabbath. In fact, in chapter 10, Israel made commitments to be faithful in all these areas, but now they had compromised again.

It is no different for us when battling with sin in our lives or others. For many Christians, Satan will get them so discouraged at their failures that they just give up and wallow in their sin. Similarly, others will give up on trying to help people all together. They say to themselves, “This is impossible.”

Again, statistically 1,700 pastors leave the ministry each month. No doubt, a major reason for this is discouragement. They feel like they are not making a change, that people are stuck in their ways, and the church is not growing. Therefore, they get discouraged and quit.

However, when God rewards his servants in the Parable of the Talents, he doesn’t reward them because they were successful; he rewards them because they were “faithful.” He says, “Well done good and faithful servant” (Matt 25:21). In the same way, we must be faithful in battling sin, faithful in battling compromise in our lives and the lives of others in order to honor God. We must be people of perseverance if we are going to get rid of sin.

Galatians 6:9 says, “Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up.”

Application Question: Do you have any people who are allowed to speak prophetically in your life? In what ways is God calling you to be an agent of change like Nehemiah in the lives of others?

Conclusion

In this text, we see common signs of decay in the lives of the people of God. What are signs of compromise amongst the people of God?

Compromised leadership
Misuse of money
A decrease in time given to worship—Sabbath
Worldly relationships
In what ways is God calling you to fix areas of compromise in your life or others? How is God calling you to be like Nehemiah, a type of Christ, who zealously confronted sin?

Application Question: What are the primary leadership lessons you learned from the book of Nehemiah and how is God challenging you to implement them into your life to become more of a godly leader?

1 The Moody Bible Commentary (Kindle Locations 26193-26194). Chicago: Moody Publishers. Kindle Edition.

2 MacArthur, John (2003-08-21). The MacArthur Bible Handbook (Kindle Location 3464). Thomas Nelson. Kindle Edition.

3 Cole, Steven. “Lesson 13: The Problem of Permissiveness (Nehemiah 13:1-31)”. Retrieved 1/15/15 from https://bible.org/seriespage/lesson-13-problem-permissiveness-nehemiah-131-31

4Turek, Frank. “Youth Exodus Problem”. retrieved 1/11/15, from http://crossexamined.org/youth-exodus-problem/

5“Statistics in Ministry”. retrieved 1/11/15, from http://www.pastoralcareinc.com/statistics/

6 MacArthur, John (2003-08-21). The MacArthur Bible Handbook (Kindle Locations 5841-5842). Thomas Nelson. Kindle Edition.

7 MacArthur, John (2003-08-21). The MacArthur Bible Handbook (Kindle Locations 6969-6970). Thomas Nelson. Kindle Edition.